If management and labor can agree, plastic bag ban must be good

03/05/2014 7:03 PM

03/06/2014 4:08 PM

I understand the financial upside for the California Grocers Association that would arise if SB 270 passes. Simply put: they will be able to charge for a product that used to be a courtesy for consumers. What's confusing and ironic, though, is why the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) is on board with an effort that threatens nearly 2,000 workers in the state's plastic bag industry.

As part of SB 270, a $2 million allocation is available for bag makers in California to alter their factories and train workers, but given the size and scope of this industry, this seems like a paltry amount.

So, the logical question is why is UFCW supporting a bill that will increase the profits of corporate grocery stores by billions of dollars and, at the same, time threaten the livelihoods of thousands of Californians?

- George Vasiliou, Carmichael

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service