Small claims plaintiffs desrve protection
03/18/2014 10:03 AM
03/18/2014 2:38 PM
Re "Judge: State court cuts causing 'crisis'" (Page A4, March 18): Funding the state courts adequately might be expensive, but talk is certainly cheap. The state courts have to deal with civil rights issues that have little to do with a lack of funding.
For example, small claims plaintiffs in Sacramento have no protection in the state courts for their constitutional right to a fair trial. If a small claims judge fails to examine the evidence, the courts with the duty to supervise have decided to improperly deny any possibility of review.
It is shameful that, as an attorney, I had to bring a still pending civil rights case in federal court to defend the right of small claims plaintiffs to trials meeting minimal constitutional standards. It is more shameful that the California Supreme Court had the first chance to address the issue and chose not to.
-- Donald D. deRosier, Carmichael
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.