SCA 5 was political pandering

03/18/2014 8:03 PM

03/19/2014 3:09 PM

Re "College entrance measure shelved" (Page A1, March 18): With one son in high school and a second on the way, it appears to me that academic success is 50 percent smarts and 50 percent student and parent discipline.

I believe this ratio will tilt more heavily toward discipline and family support in the coming years. Instead of meeting the need to create more university seats, Senate Constitutional Amendment 5 was a short-sighted example of political pandering that would have thrown smart, disciplined kids out of the system in favor of less qualified applicants.

The winners of this pandering won't be the next generation of kids. It will be those with the best lobbyists with the most money, and you will be able to see the results in the squandering of the so-called state surplus.

-- Jonathan Schrader, Elk Grove, CO

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service