Well-regulated militia?

03/19/2014 7:03 AM

03/19/2014 12:26 PM

Re "Jury finds two guilty of killing baby, father" (Page B1, March 19): The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Can Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, a vigorous advocate of people's right to own guns, explain why two members of that well-regulated militia thought the free state's security was being threatened by the 7-month-old baby and its father they shot to death?

-- Robert Schmidt, Sacramento

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service