Split ambulances from fire department
03/23/2014 10:03 AM
03/24/2014 8:56 AM
Re "Metro Fire tax seeks new charge on property owners" (Our Region, March 23): What do they call a pig when it makes one more trip to the trough? A hog. It's time to butcher the hog.
Has anyone done any studies to determine if there has been substantial loss of property or life since the existing fire stations have closed? Do I really care if my house burns down partially or burns 5 minutes longer with a delayed fire arrival, as it will be destroyed by water anyway? It's all covered by insurance. Do we need to spend $12 million a year to re-open these closed stations?
It's time to look at splitting ambulance service off from fire to save money. Maybe Emergency Medical Services could share the facilities and not command the high salaries and benefits Fire does? Salaries and pensions are outrageous for public employees who get paid to sleep one third of the time.
-- Dave Savage, Sacramento
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.