Don't buy climate change rhetoric

04/01/2014 9:04 AM

04/02/2014 9:06 AM

Re "Yes, climate change is real and it is damaging" (Editorial, April 1): The editorial board's labeling of skeptics as climate-change deniers insults the intelligence and integrity of folks capable of distinguishing rhetoric from meaningful scientific evidence.

While the board claims to be aware of overwhelming evidence to support its positions and catastrophic predictions, not a single item of actual scientific causal evidence is cited among the cherry-picked and somewhat flawed examples used to support the board's opinion.

On the opposite editorial page, columnist Bruce Mailman calls for the expulsion of three state congressmen, judging and labeling two of them as guilty before hearing any evidence presented in a court of law. I suppose one would be a denier in this case, too, to ask to see the quality of evidence presented in an objective setting before rushing to judgment and punitive action. Perhaps the board believes that public consensus is sufficient reason to ignore established proof standards.

-- Roger Hewitt, Fair Oaks

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service