McCutcheon: David Brooks is not just another ideologue

04/05/2014 8:04 PM

04/07/2014 9:15 AM

Re "Congress must act to redirect the flow of campaign money" (Viewpoints, April 5): The Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission was predictable. The court majority seems incapable of including real life consequences in their decision-making. At times, it seems consequences are irrelevant to their legal reasoning.

To me, that suggests the thinking of ideologues, not impartial jurists. Reading David Brooks' thoughtful column restored a very small glimmer of hope. Unintentionally, the court might have shifted more influence to the political parties, to the benefit of our democracy, as opposed to rule by an oligarchy of the very wealthy.

Informed, thoughtful analysis of public issues is a rare thing today. Although I very often disagree with Mr. Brooks' conclusions, I always appreciate his thoughtful approach to the issue at hand. I hope The Bee continues to carry his columns.

-- Paul D. Jordan, Volcano

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service