McKinley Village proposal shouldn't be fought

04/07/2014 3:04 PM

04/09/2014 6:41 AM

Re "McKinley Village proposal creates traffic fight with neighbors" (Page A1, April 3): The demand by opponents of McKinley Village for a vehicle underpass at Alhambra Boulevard defies common sense and ignores the facts.

I am a 20-plus resident of River Park, one of Sacramento's most livable neighborhoods. It has only two access points for about 1,700 homes and apartments which is more than five times the number proposed for McKinley Village.

Carlson Drive, the main entrance to River Park, carries over 10,000 cars a day with relative ease. According to the City's traffic projections, the 40th Street entrance to McKinley Village will carry 1,700 cars a day, about one-sixth of the traffic on Carlson Drive.

The McKinley Village proposal is the best thing for that land. We need infill housing for a more livable and sustainable city. McKinley Village should not be held hostage to unreasonable demands.

-- Frederick Tornatore, Sacramento

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service