Sugar labels proper step forward

05/25/2014 11:05 AM

05/25/2014 9:10 AM

Re "Legislature should impose warning labels on sugary soda to combat obesity and diabetes" (Editorial, May 18): California has an opportunity to advance public health in the form of SB 1000 which would require a warning label be placed on certain containers of sugar-sweetened beverages.

More than half of Californian adults and about one-third of teens are classified as overweight or obese, putting them at increased risk of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and other chronic conditions.

In California, 41 percent of children and 62 percent of teens drink at least one SSB every day. Studies have shown warning labels to be effective in helping consumers make healthier choices for themselves and for their families.

With no direct cost to taxpayers, SB 1000 is but one of many sensible public policy solutions in combating the obesity epidemic.

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association is pleased to support SB 1000 and hopes the Senate Appropriations Committee will lift the bill from the suspense file.

-- Dr. Diane Sobkowicz, Auburn

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service