06/01/2014 9:06 AM
06/02/2014 11:34 AM
Re "California's living costs hit the poor" (Page A2, June 1): There's nothing more irritating than having someone use a sloppy calculator to make a point. The CNN calculator Dan Walters uses to compare Austin to Sacramento notes that housing costs are substantially higher here, some 34 percent higher.
However, looking at actual statistics, I found that housing costs are, in fact, higher in Austin. The median rent in Sacramento is $1,150 for the city, and $1,250 for the region. In Austin, the median rent for Austin is $1,350, and $1,300 for the Austin region. (We can assume that low-income residents will be renting rather than buying.)
Now Austin may have many virtues, but cheap rent isn't one of them.
-- Alison Brennan, Sacramento
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.