Tyranny of the majority

06/01/2014 12:06 PM

06/02/2014 11:40 AM

Re "Marriage law changes a retreat for democracy" (Another View, June 1): Margaret Bengs' objection to democracy (i.e., states outlawing gay marriage) being overturned by the courts is a bit of selective reasoning. I would guess she had no trouble with George W. Bush being declared the presidential winner back in 2000.

That aside, did she ever hear of the tyranny of the majority and the Bill of Rights? Of course, the Supreme Court ruled that denying gays equal rights was unconstitutional. They just did it in a way that left the lower courts to sort out the details in each state.

It is sad to see rational thought twisted out of shape by ideological dogma.

-- Stephen Lightner, Camino

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service