Why not desalination?

06/01/2014 5:06 PM

06/02/2014 11:42 AM

Re "Are dams the answer?" (Page A1, June 1): Why isn't there public discussion of building a desalination plant to serve the state, instead of several dams?

The cost could be about the same. The ocean is always going to be there and if the climate continues to warm, there will be more of it in the future, unlike rain and snow.

Entire countries depend on this method of obtaining potable water, so why not California? One plant could serve the whole state and stop the north/south conflict.

-- Georgia Kellers, Sacramento

Editor's Choice Videos

 

Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service