Spraying won't prevent West Nile virus
07/02/2014 12:07 AM
07/03/2014 3:16 AM
Re "District will spray south Sacramento for West Nile virus" (Health and Medicine, June 30) Human infection by West Nile virus: 80 percent no symptoms, 20 percent mild illness. Only 1 in 150 infections require medical attention.
Risk of severe infection is so low that there has never been a transmission rate of more than 1 per 10,000 worldwide and 1 per 100,000 in urban areas of the U.S.
According to the CDC, the West Nile virus is a mild disease with low risk contagion compared to other infections.
Spraying dangerous neurotoxic, potentially carcinogenic organophosphates over populated areas makes no sense. There is no alarming evidence from current mosquito samples to justify this. The drought has reduced breeding habitats. The total population of mosquitoes is down. There is no increased threat. Rates of transmission are naturally decreasing.
Comparing mosquito infection rates over the years shows samples this year are minuscule. There is no safe amount of this pesticide containing dichlorvos listed under Proposition 65. Spraying is ineffective causing greater harm overall.
-- Julie Ostoich, Sacramento
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.