Hobby Lobby: Stick to the issues
07/07/2014 7:07 AM
07/07/2014 1:19 PM
Re "Court's ruling is bad policy and bad medicine" (Viewpoints, July 1): It's possible we could have more effective political debate if both sides would stick to the issue at hand instead of creating strawman positions and arguing against those. A good example is Ami Bera's rationale for opposing the recent Supreme Court decision by saying that medical decisions should be between a woman and her doctor.
Although it is a persuasive argument, it's also an argument that no one disagrees with. The debate is over whether an employer is obligated to pay for every medical decision or choice an employee and their doctor come up with. Saying that the Supreme Court decision denies basic healthcare to women is like saying I'm being denied access to basic oral hygiene because my company doesn't pay for my toothpaste.
Denial of healthcare is not the issue at hand.
-- Jerry Verseput, Folsom
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.