Return of the grizzly

07/19/2014 2:07 PM

07/17/2014 8:51 AM

Re "The return of the grizzly" (Forum, July 13): This has to be one of the worst ideas I've heard in a long time. First, this bear species/subspecies is extinct, so what is being reintroduced? It was apparently most closely related to the ferocious Alaskan grizzly.

Second, the native grizzly lived at low elevations and coastal, not in the Sierra, and it preyed on humans and other large animals. What will the introduced bears eat? Grizzlies are predators and scavengers, so they would be in your garbage can and eating your dog. Is this a good thing?

The Center for Biological Diversity should read Storer and Tevis' book "California Grizzly" and give some rational thought to exactly why reintroduction of a foreign subspecies be a good idea for California?

-- Lynn Kimsey, Davis

Editor's Choice Videos


Join the Discussion

The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service