Re "Arts commission has crucial tests on its palette" (Editorials, July 24): Sacramento has more than $2 billion in long-term debt we don't know how to pay. Yet, almost $6 million will go to public art in the new arena. Typical.
Why should the artistic taste of a few dictate what the rest of us must view -- especially if we have to pay for it? Is Sacramento's art scene vibrant and diverse? Then why not set aside space to display contributed artwork, rather than buy a few selected works? That way, more local artists could be exposed to the public, at less cost. And bad choices could be periodically replaced, as opposed to long-term monstrosities like that giant red rabbit at the airport.
Of course, the best solution would be to get government out of the art business altogether, but I suppose it's far too late for that.
-- Martin Owens, Sacramento