Ferguson: Both men are presumed innocent
08/21/2014 6:08 PM
08/22/2014 5:16 PM
Re "Jumping the gun on innocence" (Letters, Aug. 21): James McCandless criticizes the editorial board for saying Michael Brown had a right to presumption of innocence and due process of the law, but it doesn't extend the privilege to Officer Darren Wilson. Yet, two sentences later, he states that Brown "had stolen from, and physically abused a store clerk." As if Brown was already tried and convicted of the crime.
It is easy for people to sit back in their armchairs and make declarations about who is to blame or who is innocent. We don't even know if all the information we are receiving is entirely accurate.
I don't know what exactly happened, as I wasn't there. And if you weren't there, then you don't know exactly what happened either.
The right of presumption of innocence holds true for both parties.
-- Scott Hoppe, Citrus Heights
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Sacramento Bee is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.