Sacramento taxpayers are staring at a $200,000 bill to hold a special election April 7 to fill the City Council vacancy in District 6.
But City Hall may have found a way to lighten the load. On Tuesday, council members are to discuss whether to hold that election entirely through mail balloting – or whether to hold a regular election with polling places.
City Clerk Shirely Concolino estimates that an entirely vote-by-mail election could shave 25 percent off the cost, maybe more. She also says that voter turnout would likely be much higher.
This would be a first for Sacramento for a council election (there have been a few mail elections for tax measures affecting several hundred voters). But since more and more voters are casting their ballots by mail anyway, it’s a good test.
Never miss a local story.
About 55 percent of registered voters citywide and 56 percent of District 6 voters have signed up as permanent vote-by-mail. The city still plans to have at least three drop-off sites for mail ballots and one polling place on April 7 for disabled voters and last-minute drop-off ballots.
This solution would also get former Councilman Kevin McCarty off the hook. It’s his seat that needs to be filled since he won a spot in the state Assembly.
Right after the election, I suggested that it would be classy and politically savvy for him to help pay for the special election. He wasn’t exactly enthusiastic about the idea.
I expect he’d more excited about any idea to reduce the cost of replacing him.