Opinion
Comments (0) | | Print

Andres Oppenheimer: When poor test scores may be good news

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2008 - 12:00 am

MEXICO CITY — Many Mexicans reacted with shock and dismay when it was announced recently that nearly 70 percent of teachers had flunked a new nationwide test to measure whether they had the basic skills to be educators. I, for one, celebrated the news.

What is taking place in Mexico may be part of one of the most encouraging — and under-reported — trends taking place in Latin America.

For the first time, Mexico has begun to demand that all teachers who apply for new openings at public schools undergo a nationwide test. And the dismal results of the first such exam of 71,000 teachers on Aug. 11 has led the country to come to grips with the depth of its educational crisis.

Until now, Mexican teachers got their jobs by virtue of almost anything but their academic knowledge or teaching skills.

Teachers in public schools were appointed by the powerful National Teachers Union, often taking into account their political loyalties, or bought their jobs — which guaranteed lifetime employment — for about $5,000.

Not surprisingly, Mexico scored 29th among 30 countries in a recent Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development test measuring reading, math and scientific skills of 15-year-olds.

But earlier this year, following similar experiments in Chile and other Latin American countries, the government signed an agreement with the teachers union to start testing all teachers applying for new jobs in public schools.

Under the deal, known as the Alliance for the Quality of Education, all new teaching positions from now on will be filled by teachers who have passed the test, in the order of their respective scores.

Jorge Santibanez, a senior Mexican education ministry official who supervises the program, told me that Mexico has more than 1 million teachers and about 45,000 new job openings for teachers a year. This means that every year, nearly 5 percent of the teachers will join the school system after passing the exam, which would allow a gradual improvement of teachers' quality over the next 20 years.

"But we can't afford to wait that long," Santibanez said, "so we are proposing to give remedial courses to existing teachers and that they pass a certification process over the next few years.

"We are proposing to re-train about 150,000 teachers a year," he said. 'Adding together the newly hired and the re-trained teachers, we hope to renew the country's teachers' workforce within the next seven years." But is the teachers union going along with that?, I asked.

Like most other Latin American countries, Mexico has a politically powerful teachers union that, until now, successfully resisted any government efforts to reform the school system. Santibanez said that "we have reached an agreement in principle" with the union to go ahead with the certification process.

How did the government get the teachers union to agree to these reforms? I asked other Mexican officials and academics.

Most responded that the union had little choice but to negotiate, following growing public dissatisfaction over Mexican students' poor results in standardized international tests. Longtime teachers union leader Elba Esther Gordillo has political ambitions and cannot afford to be seen as the cause of Mexico's educational backwardness, they said.

The teachers union and its members, in turn, also are getting something from the recently signed Alliance: a government promise to rebuild or repair 30,000 schools around the country that have structural problems or lack such basic things as blackboards or chairs.

International education experts say Peru, Colombia and El Salvador also have begun to carry out similar teacher evaluation tests.

"It's an emerging trend," says Jeff Puryear, a Latin American education specialist with Inter-American Dialogue in Washington. "It is potentially very significant because it amounts to quality control for teachers, which most Latin American countries never had." My opinion: Granted, the Mexican teacher tests' results were abysmal. And the recently signed government agreement with the teachers union would have been much better if it also had included ruling party and opposition leaders, to ensure the program's survival in a region where new presidents often undo whatever their predecessors did.

But instead of shaking our heads in disapproval over the fact that so many teachers flunked the test, we should celebrate the fact that for the first time Mexico and other Latin American countries are recognizing the poor quality of their school systems and are doing something about it.


Andres Oppenheimer is a Latin America correspondent for the Miami Herald; e-mail: aoppenheimer@miamiherald.com.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older