Opinion
Comments (0) | | Print

My View: State prisons should look again at new ideas

Published: Friday, Dec. 5, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 19A

For years, California taxpayers have watched in dismay and then horror as prison costs spiraled out of control, as recidivism climbed higher and higher, and as those in real power and authority in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation seemed to be saying "… we're doing the best we can." Recidivism rates from our prisons now approach 70 percent.

This implies that the CDCR bureaucracy has been hamstrung, or unable to get funding, or can't find community partners to help it reform our prison system and rehabilitate inmates and parolees.

Nothing could be further from the truth. In 2005, the federal court system took charge of CDCR's inmate health care services. The federal receiver promptly set about hiring hundreds of new employees at astronomical salaries, all to correct perceived deficiencies. CDCR's annual budget is now close to $10 billion a year. Now, the same federal court system is about to order the release of thousands of inmates because of severe overcrowding. This could put the public in danger as untrained and unprepared inmates are released back onto our streets.

Along with overcrowding and poor medical care, inmates are still not truly rehabilitated and given the tools they need to become taxpayers and not tax users when they parole. Vocational training within prison walls is hit-and-miss, and little is done to help ensure that inmates, once they parole, will not come back.

Faced with opposition from area residents, CDCR still clings to the hope that its plan for mini-prisons (or "re-entry centers," as it likes to refer to them) will fly, permitting it to build many 500-inmate prisons all over California. CDCR has placed local elected officials, who are now facing severe budget deficits, in the awkward position of trying to accept millions of CDCR dollars to build these facilities (and balance their budgets), while at the same time trying to calm their constituents. All this is aimed at reducing overcrowding, but in reality will simply spread the inmates out and drastically increase expenditures.

Several important studies over the past 20 years have recognized that there are solid and successful programs which reduce recidivism. CDCR refuses to implement such programs, while continuing to fund outdated, poor and unsuccessful programs within its system. As far as we can determine, no continually funded CDCR program to date has been shown to reduce recidivism, a major contributor to prison overcrowding.

With this as a backdrop, several of us, all former law enforcement professionals, banded together to advance a proposal to CDCR. We asked them to help us build Parolee Centers where parolees and others can receive state-of-the-art vocational training coupled with life skills and behavioral modification programs, so these parolees become taxpayers instead of tax users.

We even offered to start the training "inside," while the parolee was still an inmate, to help guarantee that training and a livable wage job would be quick at hand once they were paroled. The best part about our proposal was that adult education programs within our existing school systems had agreed to teach the classes to keep the cost down. Our program would not only reduce the number of parolees returning to state prison, it would help relieve pressure on the county jails and keep our communities safer.

You would have thought that CDCR would have jumped at the chance to help regain its footing and the trust of California taxpayers. Not a chance. CDCR's bureaucracy simply blew us off. They had their high-paying, secure jobs, and they weren't about to let a group of upstarts like us intrude on their turf. Now CDCR will be forced to come back to the taxpayers for yet another bailout.

We say, "Enough!"

The entire top level of CDCR needs a thorough housecleaning. Matt Cate, the new CDCR secretary, is trying hard, but he's overwhelmed. Some of his management team have served him poorly, and they need to go.

Almost 12 years ago, we watched as the Sacramento City Unified School District's adult education campus started a truck driver training program aimed squarely at parolees. After 12 years, the documented recidivism rate from this award-winning program stands at 7 percent! Even though our Sacramento pilot program proved that parolees can be trained using our approach and can be made into taxpayers, CDCR will still have none of it.

Reducing recidivism is the quickest and cheapest way to reduce our overcrowded system and will also send a solid message to both the federal courts and California taxpayers that CDCR does have the ability to get its house in order.

But don't hold your breath.


Larry Bowler is a former member of the state Assembly and a former lieutenant in the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department. Robert Presley is a former state senator and former undersheriff of Riverside County. D. O. "Spike" Helmick is a former commissioner of the California Highway Patrol.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older