Opinion
Comments (0) | | Print

Letters to the editor

Published: Saturday, Aug. 15, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 12A

The First Amendment and Lodi

Re "Pray away – but not as part of council meeting" (Viewpoints, Aug. 11): Bruce Maiman argues against public prayers in Lodi by quoting the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The Lodi City Council is not the Congress! The First Amendment prohibits the federal government from establishing a national religion.

I agree with Maiman that government-endorsed prayers of a particular religion (Christian) are poor public policy. Equally poor policy would be prayers specific to Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu or any number of religions likely found in Lodi (or anywhere else in the United States). If any public body feels the need for divine guidance, it should simply pray to the god that all religions have in common.

Our founding fathers were probably not all Christian, but they were most certainly deist. That is not a religion but a philosophy. Look at the money in your pocket: "In God We Trust." I agree.

– Don Petron, Sacramento

Out on the road, you never know

Re "On simple trips, death can lurk" (Our Region, Aug. 12): Marcos Breton's powerful piece resonates with my near-death experience on Interstate 80 nearly two years ago.

I was eastbound just beyond Arden Way when a sedan heading west shot over the embankment, knocking me into the path of a truck and two other vehicles. After being pried out of my car semiconscious, via the Jaws of Life, I was rushed to UC Davis Medical Center, where I spent several days in intensive care and the trauma center.

My leg and ribs were broken. I sustained multiple contusions, a deep gash on my elbow and a slight crack in my sacrum that thankfully did not require surgery.

The state policeman who investigated the accident and the medical staff were amazed that I survived, much less was not paralyzed. The driver who hit me was drunk and had traces of drugs in her system.

There has not been a day since then that I fail to give thanks for my good fortune. Breton's perceptive column should be required reading by drivers everywhere.

– Alan Miller, Sacramento

Freeways are safer in Seattle

Re "On simple trips, death can lurk" (Our Region, Aug. 12): This article described the dangerous conditions on our freeways and roads leading to the recent death of a young mother.

The reason we have this danger is that our speed and safe-driving laws are not enforced. An example is Highway 50 from Howe Avenue into the city. It's become a raceway. I often have cars passing going 90 mph, tailgating and switching lanes back and forth. Almost never is anyone apprehended.

Seattle is a sharp contrast; you seldom drive there without seeing patrols issuing tickets roadside. Certainly, their revenue is more than covering costs. So traffic there is moving at a sedate speed, without any tailgating or lane switching. You feel very safe.

It's time Sacramento eliminates dangerous raceway conditions on our freeways.

– Merick Chaffee, Sacramento

Colorado walks the talk

Re "Pedestrian risks can be reduced" (Editorial, Aug. 13): While traveling in Colorado last summer, I was impressed by the state's "awareness" campaign regarding pedestrian rights of way at intersections and crosswalks. At the edge of many crosswalks, there are prominent signs to inform drivers that Colorado state law gives pedestrians the right of way.

This is similar to signs around Sacramento, letting drivers know the size of the fine for red-light running. Adopting the Colorado signage approach to pedestrian rights should be part of the "Start Seeing Pedestrians" campaign recommended in The Bee's editorial.

And since it is more than a local problem, something similar should be done at the state level to increase driver awareness of pedestrians.

– Jim Hare, Sacramento

City exec touts water efforts

Re "Amid drought, city waters more" (Page A1, Aug. 9): The city of Sacramento certainly recognizes the need to improve its water conservation efforts. However, The Bee failed to investigate many ways the city is already making progress.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover