Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review.

Opinion
Comments (0) | | Print

Rich Lowry: Video sting puts ACORN's scofflaw radicalism on display

Published: Tuesday, Sep. 15, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 15A
Last Modified: Tuesday, Sep. 15, 2009 - 3:10 pm

The radical activist group ACORN is the E.F. Hutton of prostitution. It stands ready to provide discreet advice on setting up a brothel and engaging in other, associated acts of criminality. When ACORN talks, pimps and hookers listen.

This has been established by an audacious video sting operation undertaken by conservative documentarian James O'Keefe, 25, and his sidekick Hannah Giles, 20. O'Keefe posed as a pimp and Giles as a prostitute seeking help getting a mortgage for a brothel. In cities around the country, workers for ACORN – the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – happily obliged.

The videos are "60 Minutes" for the YouTube age. Posted at the new Web site BigGovernment.com and aired on Fox News, they are yet another indication of the loosening grip of the legacy media. A couple of 20-somethings crafted a devastating exposé with just a hidden camera and some gumption. The Census Bureau immediately severed its ties with ACORN.

In Baltimore, ACORN staffers assured O'Keefe and Giles that the group doesn't "discriminate" – i.e., has no standards whatsoever. Giles was told if she makes $96,000 a year selling sex, she should tell the government she only makes $9,600. Her occupation should be reported as "performing artist." If the conversation had gone longer, surely she would have been advised how to apply for a National Endowment for the Arts grant.

O'Keefe noted that they wanted a house for 13 underage girls who would be imported to work as prostitutes. Only three, not all 13, of the girls can be listed as dependents, ACORN prudently advised. And so long as they are under 16, they would make O'Keefe and his partner eligible for the child tax credit.

So it went in other ACORN offices. In Washington, D.C., O'Keefe and Giles were told they could lie in their loan application for the house. "We are looking out for you," an ACORN staffer said reassuringly. In Brooklyn, Giles was told to identify herself in loan documents as a "freelancer" and to bury cash proceeds of her work in the backyard. Imagine what tax advice John Dillinger might have gotten had he ever consulted ACORN.

The group has responded to the videos with a flurry of smears and excuses. The tapes are a distortion – even though ACORN fired the workers involved. Other ACORN offices didn't fall for O'Keefe's stunt – but is it a defense if only a few of your offices abet sex slavery? The video operation was imbued with racism – never mind that it was ACORN staff helping two white people exploit underage Latino girls. The ACORN workers involved were poorly trained – but how much training does it take to recoil at criminality?

The ACORN staff comported itself in keeping with ACORN founder Wade Rathke's philosophy of "maximum eligible participation." The idea is to sign up as many people as possible for government benefits. It has its roots, Matthew Vadum of the Washington-based Capital Research Center writes, in the 1960s New Left vision that "called upon activists to pack the welfare rolls to spread dependency, bankrupt the government and cause uprisings against the capitalist system."

If the revolutionary fires don't burn as brightly anymore, ACORN still has radical aspirations and a marginal commitment to the political and legal system. Unsurprisingly, its voter-registration efforts are synonymous with fraud. For all its disgust with capitalism, ACORN is well-heeled, between its membership fees, foundation grants, corporate shakedowns and government funding. By one estimate, it has garnered $53 million in federal funds since 1993.

This must stop. It's as if the government had contracted with a right-wing militia to conduct gun-safety courses. After the voter-registration scandals of last year, Republicans agitated for a congressional investigation of the group. Democratic Rep. John Conyers initially agreed, then relented. "The powers that be" in the House wanted him to back off, he explained. Time for the powers that be to reconsider.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover