Opinion
Comments (0) | | Print

Editorial: Districts must forge new partnerships

Published: Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 6E
Last Modified: Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2009 - 8:40 am

Anyone who thinks the worst budget pain in California is over should think again. It will be years before state revenues return to pre-recession levels.

Hoping for a return to business as usual is a doomed strategy. In this climate, public education, which at 40 percent is the largest part of the state budget, should lead the way in fundamental rethinking and restructuring.

The task for local districts is: How to achieve efficiencies to assure that increasingly scarce funds go to classroom instruction?

School districts already are creating interdistrict collaboratives to achieve savings in providing some services - special education, transportation, purchasing of supplies and equipment, and more. That's a start.

But they can do much more to eliminate fragmentation and duplication. California today has 550 separate elementary school districts, overlapping with 84 high school districts. These relics from the early 20th century each have separate administrators and school boards.

The state has only 333 unified K-12 districts.

In 2002, the Legislature's updated Master Plan for Education called upon the state to take steps to bring all school districts into unified K-12 structures. The separate elementary and high school districts, it said, "perpetuate isolated approaches to education delivery."

A prime example is the multiple districts in Sacramento's north area. Between 1949 and 1972, unification proposals for these fragmented districts went to voters six times and were defeated - the casualty of conflict, distrust and mismanagement.

Voters in the Natomas elementary district finally became so frustrated with the Grant high school district, where they sent kids to middle and high school, that they created a breakaway K-12 district in 1991.

A breakthrough came in 2007, when voters merged three elementary districts (Rio Linda Union, North Sacramento and Del Paso Heights) and the Grant high school district. The old districts disappeared and a whole new district - Twin Rivers Unified - was created (see map).

But the work is not done. Two tiny elementary districts nestled inside the Twin Rivers Unified boundary - Elverta and Robla - declined to join. And the Natomas district remains on its own.

Now is a good time for these districts to join together in a single district. The Natomas district, with a deteriorating financial situation and a superintendent retiring in November, has an opportunity for major change. These tough economic times should unleash creative ideas with some urgency.


Tomorrow: Rethink River Delta Unified, spread across three counties.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover