ANDY ALFARO / aalfaro@sacbee.com

Community activist Derrell Roberts speaks to the Sacramento City Council on Tuesday in favor of raising the city sales tax from 7.75 percent to 8 percent to suppress street gangs.

Debate at Tuesday's city council meeting

Our Region
Comments (0) | | Print

Gang tax fails by 1 vote in council

Published: Wednesday, Jul. 30, 2008 - 12:00 am | Page 1A

Sacramento's proposed anti-gang tax was dumped by the City Council on Tuesday night.

Doomed by its failure to meet much of the city's public safety needs, the measure calling for a quarter-percentage-point increase in the city's sales tax fell one council vote short of the six it needed to appear on the Nov. 4 ballot.

Had it made it to the ballot – and then gained two-thirds of the vote – the tax hike would have added $16 million to city coffers for prevention and enforcement efforts in the fight against street gangs.

Council members Sandy Sheedy, Steve Cohn, Robbie Waters and Lauren Hammond voted against the measure.

Mayor Heather Fargo and council members Ray Tretheway, Rob Fong, Bonnie Pannell and Kevin McCarty voted for the plan.

Hammond, who abstained from voting on the measure last week, said Tuesday she'd rather see a measure that calls for a tax supporting parks, transit and public safety.

"Instead of going to the voters in a piecemeal fashion one issue at a time, we (should) ask for everything at the same time with a reasonable amount," Hammond said.

Supporters of the measure – led by Fargo – said the tax increase made sense as the city grapples with a sagging budget and persistent youth crime.

"I was really convinced it made sense," Fargo said. "There's no magic money here, no big pot of money we haven't looked for. This was a real missed opportunity."

The measure called for the addition of nearly 60 Police Department personnel in the first year. It also would have provided an influx of revenue – estimated at $9.6 million in the first year – for community organizations working in gang prevention.

The tax increase from 7.75 percent to 8 percent would have been in effect for 15 years. The city now spends $2.4 million tackling youth violence, a number that includes the new Office of Youth Development.

"This measure is an opportunity to address a full generation of people," Assistant City Manager Cassandra Jennings told the council.

Opponents of the measure said the ordinance did not go far enough to beef up the city's shrinking Police Department and ignored the Fire Department's budget woes. The Police Department has lost 75 officers since last summer and has one of the smallest forces per capita in the nation, while fire stations are on rolling brownouts caused by budget cutbacks.

The city's public safety challenges would be better supported by a tax measure that addresses both the Police and Fire departments, opponents said. A plan to place an assessment on a future ballot connected to the city's public safety master plan has been looked at by the police and fire unions. But they balked at introducing it this year.

City officials said any new sales tax increase could not appear on the ballot until the next general election in 2010.

Those who voted against the measure also said it was rushed through the council too quickly and was a hand-me-down from a failed county proposal scrapped earlier this month.

Hammond said the plan would have come before voters at the same time the city is floating a tax on text messaging and battling scandals within the Utilities Department and library authority. She said city officials would be better off asking the voters to approve a new vote at "a time when we have more public trust."

Officials said the added revenue from the anti-gang tax could have paid for 30 street police in the first year. Two dozen uniformed community service officers also could have joined the department's ranks to handle paperwork and reports, freeing up police to tackle street gangs.

Police Chief Rick Braziel said Monday many of the officers brought on through the measure would have tackled crime sprees involving young suspects and that some of the officers could have been used to beef up the department's gang unit. "This would have helped," he said.

The revenue also would have helped city programs and community groups working with at-risk youth.

Derrell Roberts, co-founder of the Roberts Family Development Center in North Sacramento, said groups are already underfunded and called Tuesday's vote "politics winning out over kids."

"There's so much denial (on the City Council), it's scary," he said.

Roberts accused Sheedy of failing to acknowledge the scope of the crime problem in her district, which covers North Sacramento, Del Paso Heights and other neighborhoods in the city's northeast corner.

Sheedy said reports of high gang crime in her district were exaggerated, although police statistics show it has had the most shootings into occupied buildings and tied for the most homicides of any council district over the past 18 months.

"I don't think the councilwoman of District 2 understands the problem in her own backyard," Roberts said.

Officials said there are 4,300 gang members in the city, 850 of whom are children. According to Braziel, the gang issue spreads beyond city streets.

"We've seen pictures of gangsters raising their children to be gangsters," he said, adding gangs have begun recruiting in grammar schools.

Supporters of the measure vowed to keep exploring ways to fund youth violence and gang prevention efforts.

"It's a setback, but it's not the end," said Sacramento County Supervisor Roger Dickinson, who spearheaded the failed county measure.

Mayoral candidate Kevin Johnson, a vocal opponent of the measure, released a statement indicating he would meet with community groups later this week to discuss other options.

"The soaring rate in crime under Mayor Fargo's watch didn't appear overnight and wouldn't have been solved with an 11th-hour, election-year piecemeal approach that lacked the support of local law enforcement and community leaders," Johnson said in a statement released by his campaign.

"We need a comprehensive strategy with broad-based community support that attacks both the problem and its root causes, and has the active support of law enforcement."


Call The Bee's Ryan Lillis, (916) 321-1085.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older