Our Region
Comments (0) | | Print

The Public Eye: Sacramento may have paid way too much for depot

Published: Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 1B
Last Modified: Saturday, Feb. 7, 2009 - 10:51 am

THE MONEY TRAIL

Sacramento may have paid way too much for depot

Two years ago, when times were better, the city gave Thomas Enterprises a financial assist to help the developer close on its purchase of the downtown railyard from Union Pacific.

In emergency session, the City Council agreed to pay $55 million for the historic I Street depot and 8 acres.

Although there wasn't evidence the land and station were actually worth that much, the parties said they'd settle up later through negotiations or mediation.

Now the city faces its own $50 million budget gap, and two appraisals found the land is worth far less than the city paid.

"My view is we overpaid and we really didn't have a system in place to get our money back," Councilman Kevin McCarty said. "It's a lot of money we're talking about, and we're not holding the pedal to the metal."

Councilman Rob Fong agreed, saying the city appraisals concluded it overpaid by at least $40 million. "We need to move quickly on this, and I don't know what's taking so long," Fong said.

Assistant City Manager Marty Hanneman said the issue is going to mediation. "If mediation isn't successful, we'll go into binding arbitration," he said. "Our goal is to have this done in June or July."

He said the feds required two appraisals, which slowed the process.

Most of the $55 million came from Measure A transportation funds and couldn't be used to fill the city's budget gap, Hanneman said. He estimated $5 million could be appropriated for other purposes.

– Mary Lynne Vellinga. Send tips to moneytrail@sacbee.com

ON YOUR GUARD

DA's offices investigate firm's tax relief claims

Property owners beware, says Ken Stieger, the Sacramento County assessor.

A Southern California company has been blanketing the area with official- looking forms promising to help homeowners get their property tax bills reduced, all for the low, low price of $95.

The forms from Homeowners Tax Review in Pasadena tell owners that they need to respond "NO LATER THAN 2/11/09."

But Stieger says it's too late to appeal last year's assessment, and owners can't begin to appeal next year's until July. By then, the assessor will review property assessments for free at a homeowner's request.

Stieger notified the Sacramento County district attorney about the company, and it's working with the Los Angeles DA's office to investigate.

One of the company's owners, Jeff Moffat, defended the mailers. "We're not a scam," Moffat said. "We provide a service to our clients."

Moffat, who operates a law firm specializing in captive insurance (a regulated form of self-insurance) out of the same address as HTR, doesn't think the mailer looks like a tax bill and said the form says the company is not a government agency. That disclaimer is in smaller font than surrounding type.

For more information, see www.assessor.saccounty.net.

– Robert Lewis. Send tips to moneytrail@sacbee.com


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older