As Congress and President Barack Obama began wading into national health care reform earlier this year, California's leaders were already embroiled in debate over what they could do on their own turf.
Congress might eventually enact changes that address consumer complaints about being denied insurance coverage or being thrown off individual plans, a practice called rescission.
Federal lawmakers also might get around to outlawing practices that allow some insurers to charge women more because of their gender, or extra to get maternity benefits.
But like other states, California has the power to pass its own laws to provide relief, absent federal solutions.
"It's critically important we do these things, whether it's rescission reform or maternity reform at the state level," said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California.
"Things could change with federal reform," he said, "but we can't wait."
Three key bills that health care advocates lobbied for were approved by the Democratic-controlled state Legislature this year.
But the proposals didn't garner Republican support, and the insurance industry opposes them.
The bills are on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's desk, awaiting his signature or veto.
More individual policies
More than 2.6 million Californians buy insurance individually rather than through a group, and purchases are growing. Buyers included the self-employed, early retirees, part-timers and young adults who no longer have parental coverage.
One bill stops insurers from charging women more – so-called gender rating – for coverage they buy on the individual market. Ten states already prohibit it.
Another bill requires that all individual policies include maternity benefits. Right now, if a woman wants to add that coverage, it can cost hundreds of dollars a month extra.
The third bill requires insurers to prove to a review panel that individual-market customers "willfully" lied about health histories before policies can be revoked.
Such cancellations, or rescission, of thousands of policies in California for flimsy reasons prompted a class-action lawsuit. A 2007 settlement with state regulators requires insurers to offer some restitution to customers stuck with medical bills.
The insurance industry is urging the governor to veto the bills – and insiders are confident he's listening to them.
The rescission bill, the industry says, goes too far in its attempt to control insurers.
The gender-related bills, the industry also says, could push some people to drop coverage because they won't want to absorb higher premiums for maternity coverage.
Issue of cost vs. bias
Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, is author of the bill prohibiting gender rating, which for women can result in paying premiums 10 to 25 percent higher than men for identical coverage.
"I am very hopeful," Jones said, "the governor will not march in lock step with those who would discriminate against women."
Federal law prohibits gender rating in group policies. It also requires that maternity coverage be offered as a routine matter in employer plans with more than 15 people.
During the 1990s, 10 states, including New York and New Jersey, banned gender rating within the individual market. Two states limit it.
Anne Eowan, vice president of the Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies, which opposes Jones' bill, said gender rating makes sense in the smaller universe of individual plans.
Younger women use more preventive care than younger men, she said, but older women use it less frequently than men.
"We don't feel it is discrimination," Eowan said.
In Minnesota and Montana, where gender rating in the individual market has also been banned, critics compared it to charging African Americans more than whites, according to a report by the National Women's Law Center.
Although it is hard to isolate the impact that banning gender rating has on insurance markets, none of the states that have prohibited it reported a surge in costs, said Richard Cauchi, who tracks state health-related proposals for the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Call Susan Ferriss, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 321-1267.


About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.