For anyone who wanted to get involved in statewide or local ballot measure campaigns during the recently concluded 2015-16 election cycle, they could take their pick of issues.
The June and November ballots featured 18 statewide ballot measures on subjects ranging from plastic bag bans to legalizing recreational pot. Local ballots, meanwhile, included dozens of measures on issues such as fire services funding and football stadiums.
State filings, though, show that most of the more than three-dozen current or former California lawmakers with ballot measure committees took minor, if any, roles in actual ballot measure campaigns during the last election cycle.
Even as the committees took in millions of dollars, most of the accounts reported relatively small donations to ballot measure campaigns or clearly identified spending on their behalf, according to end-of-year campaign disclosures due last month.
Never miss a local story.
The exceptions were Gov. Jerry Brown and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom. Brown’s ballot measure committee reported giving $4.1 million to the campaign to pass Proposition 57, a measure changing state parole policies. Newsom’s ballot measure committee led and funded the $4.5 million effort to pass Proposition 63, which imposes new gun control rules.
Businesses, unions, and others could give no more than $8,400 to legislative candidates and officeholders during the last election cycle. Those officials, though, also can have ballot measure committees with no restrictions.
Almost two-thirds of of the $2.84 million raised by legislators’ ballot measure accounts in 2015-16 came in amounts exceeding candidate contribution limits.
Loyola Law School professor Jessica A. Levinson, president of the the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, called the rule “an end run around contribution limits.”
“It’s just another way for candidates and officeholders to legally raise money” above voter-approved candidate limits, she said.
Spending reports by the committees often lack an obvious link to a ballot measure purpose. Many expenses are categorized broadly, such as fundraising, consulting or travel – the same types of expenses reported by candidates’ main campaign committee.
The rules, Levinson said, “are very broad and forgiving. They give an incredible amount of discretion” to lawmakers.
Valley Solutions, the ballot measure committee of Assemblyman Adam Gray, D-Merced, reported the third-most total spending in 2015-16, $454,000, behind Brown and Newsom’s committees.
Committee filings detail $10,000 in contributions to state and local ballot measure committees. In addition, the account reported spending tens of thousands of dollars to poll on local and statewide measures.
Mike Lynch, a Gray spokesman, said the committee also paid more than $100,000 to produce digital ads urging people to support transportation tax measures in Stanislaus and Merced counties. Both passed.
“One of the reasons they’re through is we had that ballot committee,” Lynch said of Valley Solutions. “He has no qualms about doing that.”
Data Tracker is a regular feature that breaks down the numbers behind today’s news. Explore more trends at sacbee.com/datatracker.
Ballot committee spending on ballot measures
More than three-dozen current or former California constitutional officers and legislators had ballot measure committees during the 2015-16 campaign season. They raised and spent significant sums into the accounts, which are not covered by contribution limits. Ballot measure committees that spent the most during 2015-16:
How much of it had clear links to 2015-16 ballot measures?
Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom
Safety for All, Yes on 63
All of it to pass Proposition 63 (gun control)
Gov. Jerry Brown
Gov. Brown’s Ballot Measure Committee
$4.1 million for yes-on-Proposition 57 (criminal justice system)
Assemblyman Adam Gray, D-Merced
$10,000 in donations to local and state ballot measures; more than $100,000 in spending to help pass local ballot measures; polling
State Sen. Toni Atkins, D-San Diego
$83,000 in donations to San Diego-area ballot measures and county Democratic Party
State Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens
Californians for 21st Century Economy
$49,500 donation to pass Proposition 58 (bilingual education)
Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León, D-L.A.
Believing in a Better California
$208,000 in independent expenditures to help propositions 55 (tax increase) and 63
State Sen. Ed Hernandez, D-Azusa
San Gabriel Valley Public Services
Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley Thomas, D-L.A.
Californians for Full Employment and Balanced Growth
$65,000 in donations to state and local measures
State Sen. Bob Hertzberg, D-L.A.
Californians for Fair Tax Policy
Former Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara
Das Williams for Isla Vista Self Governance
Supported Measure E, Nov. 8 measure to create an Isla Vista community services district
Assemblyman Evan Low, D-Campbell
California to Innovate for California’s Future
$28,000 in donations to local and state ballot measure campaigns
Assemblyman Ian Calderon, D-Whittier
Californians for Strong Communities
$64,000 in independent expenditures to help pass Proposition 50 (suspending lawmakers)
Assemblyman Rob Bonta, D-Alameda
$34,500 in donations to local ballot measures
Assemblyman Rudy Salas, D-Bakersfield
Salas for a Strong California
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount
Keep California Competitive
$5,000 to local parks ballot measure
Source: Bee analysis of filings with California secretary of state