RANDY PENCH / Bee file, 2009

RANDY PENCH Bee file, 2009 Under Kenny Natt, the relatively healthy Kings have gone 10-40 while allowing a staggering 110.5 points per game.

Sports
Comments (0) | | Print

Natt's chances of returning as Kings' coach appear dim

Published: Friday, Apr. 3, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 4C

Beno Udrih knew the solution, even if he was part of the problem.

"At the end of the game, we have to execute better," the Kings point guard said after Wednesday's 143-141 overtime loss at Golden State.

With eight games left and the Kings (16-58) on track to be the worst team in the 50-year franchise history, the inability to finish close games has significantly hurt coach Kenny Natt's chances of returning next season. The Kings have lost 10 consecutive games decided by seven points or fewer, turning the in-house spotlight to matters of coaching creativity and late-game control.

Combined with the defensive effort that has continued to worsen after the Dec. 15 decision to fire Reggie Theus and his defensive coach, assistant Chuck Person, Natt's chances of having his 2009-10 contract option picked up do not appear promising. And according to two sources close to the team, a familiar name from a past Kings coaching search is seriously being considered for the job.

John Whisenant, the Monarchs' general manager, was the front-runner for the Kings' head-coaching job in 2006 before Eric Musselman was hired. Whisenant now appears to be the unofficial front-runner again if Natt does not return.

As was the case three summers ago, Whisenant's reputation as a defensive specialist is appealing for a team lacking defense.

While Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie was resistant then to hiring a coach whose close ties with Kings co-owners Joe and Gavin Maloof have been well-chronicled and who has no NBA experience, the dynamic is different now in light of a somewhat-recent addition.

Kings consultant Pete Carril, a close friend of Petrie's and his former coach at Princeton, likely would be on Whisenant's staff if he were hired and would continue to have a strong influence on the team's offense.

The teaming, it would seem, could satisfy both ownership and the front office – if not the fans – after years of failed attempts to reach a common ground when it came to hiring coaches.

What's more, Whisenant – whom the Maloofs have sought as an informal adviser for years on Kings-related matters – is believed to have strongly supported the idea of Carril returning in early January.

The decision on Natt has not been made, but much of the damage certainly has been done. While comparisons between Theus' 2008-09 tenure and that of Natt's are complex because of various injuries and significant roster changes, his bosses are making comparisons nonetheless.

Under Theus, the Kings went 6-18, allowed 106.0 points per game and scored an average of 97.7 points while playing without center Brad Miller for five games, leading scorer Kevin Martin for 15 games and swingman Francisco García for 17.

Under Natt, the relatively healthy Kings have gone 10-40 while allowing a staggering 110.5 points per game and scoring at a clip of 102.5. Despite the addition of Carril to help with the offense, the drastic defensive decline, above all, has hurt Natt's cause.

There was no sign of defensive effort on either side on Wednesday night, as Martin exploded for 50 points and became just the second King in the team's Sacramento era to hit 50. The other was Chris Webber, who scored 51 points in an overtime loss to Indiana on Jan. 5, 2001.

Once again, the Kings' defense, which is ranked last in the league in opponent field-goal percentage (48.4), allowed the Warriors to shoot 53.5 percent overall and had 60 points in the paint.

Udrih not only had numerous questionable decisions down the stretch, he hit only 3 of 9 shots in the fourth quarter and overtime (6 of 18 overall). Also, he was unable to stop guard Monta Ellis, who scored a career-high 42 points.

Whether that failing defense will lead to Natt's end with the Kings, of course, remains to be seen.


Read the Kings blog at www.sacbee.com/kingsblog.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.


Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com

Quick Job Search

View All Top Jobs
Buy
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover