July 2008 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Not that I'm in the habit of referring to Web sites that might be considered competitors, but it's hard to ignore comment on two back-to-back stories listed today on the political news compendium known as Rough & Tumble.
From the S.F. Chronicle is a piece headlined: "Prop. 99 likely to have little effect."
Followed by a piece in the North County Times titled: "Prop. 99's limited protection may lead to more reform."
Thank goodness Prop. 98, which like 99 dealt with eminent domain, was defeated. Otherwise it might be really confusing.
Copyright © 2007. All Rights Reserved. Sacbee.com | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use