Daniel Weintraub
Recent Entries
- eBay wins court ruling in Tiffany lawsuit
- UC Med Schools
- Why that Tahoe fire is still burning
- Utilities Dept. slush fund
- Slow news day? Old, new media push Schwarzenegger/Obama rumor
- Tax hike proposal brings clarity to debate
- Mt. Shasta's glaciers growing; global warming blamed
- Safe to breathe?
- Water woes
- Shark bites
Archives
July 2008 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
RSS feeds
November 20, 2007
Friends of the River on a water deal
Here is a nice exposition of the enviro viewpoint on the water storage issue from the Friends of the River (via Steve Maviglio). On above-ground storage, they almost seem to be in sync with Tom McClintock's view on the subject: it's ok, but let the users pay for it. I'm sure they would go their separate ways on the environmental issues raised by any storage project, but on the financing, they are in agreement.
Posted by dweintraub on November 20, 2007 11:35 AMCopyright © 2007. All Rights Reserved. Sacbee.com | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use