404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

404 Not Found

Our apologies....

We can't find the page you requested in this location.

The story may have moved or expired.

You may wish to:

The mystery is over: The campaign to suspend California's landmark greenhouse-gas emissions law will be led by an out-of-state oil refinery company and a California taxpayer advocacy group, newly filed documents show.

Valero Energy Corp. and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association were listed as principal officers in organizational documents filed with the state Friday to raise funds to shelve Assembly Bill 32, passed several years ago.

A signature-gathering drive began last week to qualify for the November ballot an initiative to suspend AB 32, which requires California to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020.

Assemblyman Dan Logue, R-Linda, and public relations officials hired to assist in the initiative campaign consistently have declined to confirm reports that two Texas-based oil companies, Valero and Tesoro Corp., are financing the effort.

Public records filed Friday removed some of the mystery, identifying officers of the fundraising committee as Scott Folwarkow, Valero's director of government affairs in California, and Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

The records did not identify donors, however, and Coupal declined to discuss details, including Tesoro's reported involvement, pending the filing of other disclosure documents.

"I'm not at liberty to say who's going to be part of it," he said. "There are going to be a lot of businesses, big and small, that are under the yoke of AB 32 regulations. We'll have a broad coalition."

Named the California Jobs Initiative Committee, the effort led by Coupal and Folwarkow described itself in Friday's documents as a "coalition of taxpayers, employers, food producers, energy, transportation and forestry companies." Names of participating firms were not listed.

Steve Maviglio, spokesman for a coalition fighting the initiative, contends that the reason for the signature-gathering drive's secrecy has been fear of a backlash if voters knew that out-of-state oil companies were bankrolling the drive.

Opponents of AB 32 contend it could hurt California's economy and hamper unemployment by costing businesses billions to implement. Supporters counter that the measure is vital to the environment and to attracting a wave of "green technology" firms to the state.

The initiative, if passed by voters, would suspend AB 32 until California's unemployment level drops to 5.5 percent for at least a year.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Popular Categories

Now on sacbee.com/politics

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

The State Worker Blog

Latest posts:
    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives

Latest California Clips

[an error occurred while processing this directive]