404 - Not Found - sacbee.com

404 Not Found

Our apologies....

We can't find the page you requested in this location.

The story may have moved or expired.

You may wish to:

Two Republican members of an Assembly subcommittee have joined a largely Democratic move to stop a $41.6 million plan to fingerprint recipients of subsidized in-home care.

GOP assemblymen Bill Emmerson of Hemet and Brian Nestande of Palm Desert voted in their budget subcommittee Wednesday to stop spending $8.2 million this year on the anti-fraud plan, which would cost an estimated $41.6 million over seven years.

The assemblymen also voted to repeal the fingerprinting in general of disabled and senior recipients of In-Home Supportive Services. The motion also requires a cost-benefit analysis to estimate what fingerprinting would save by preventing fraud.

Three Democrats on the eight-member subcommittee also voted for these motions. The motion to repeal fingerprinting of recipients would have to go before the Legislature to be approved.

The $41.6 million plan would require buying numerous $5,000-a-piece mobile devices that county social workers would use to take prints and photos of in-care recipients in their homes.

The California Department of Social Services idea was to download the data into an existing state fingerprinting system to check whether recipients were fraudulently enrolling in more than one county or under different names.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger contends that fraud is a major problem wasting millions in the in-home care program, which is the state's fastest growing social service program. The state shoulders about a third of the more than $5.4 billion a year in costs for caring for about 440,000 people.

Last year, the Legislature funneled money to county district attorneys to investigate fraud and require care providers to be fingerprinted.

In a joint statement to the Bee, Emmerson and Nestande said: "Based on the testimony we heard in the Budget Committee on Health and Human Services and with an $18 billion state budget deficit, we must do all we can to cut costs, limit spending, and eliminate government waste. Due to the high costs associated with fingerprinting IHSS recipients, we don't believe that funding this program is warranted at this time."

"However," the assemblymen added, "we will continue to support fingerprinting IHSS providers and other anti-fraud reforms that the Legislature passed last year."

In the Senate, a budget subcommittee has taken a similar stand, voting May 6 to stop the $8.2 million expenditure and to repeal the fingerprinting of recipients.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


More Capitol Alert

Capitol Alert on Twitter

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Popular Categories

Now on sacbee.com/politics

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

The State Worker Blog

Latest posts:
    404 - Not Found - sacbee.com

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

Categories


October 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Monthly Archives


Latest California Clips

[an error occurred while processing this directive]