<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Capitol Alert</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2008-05-17:/capitolalertlatest//41</id>
    <updated>2012-02-11T02:02:50Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The latest on California politics and government</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.34-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Perez: Corporations not people &apos;until Texas executes one&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/california-assembly-speaker-john-perez-corporations-not-people-until-texas-executes-one.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51326</id>

    <published>2012-02-11T02:02:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-11T02:02:50Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[SAN DIEGO -- Assembly Speaker John A. P&eacute;rez may be nowhere more popular than at a labor caucus meeting at a Democratic convention, and so it was that he received a standing ovation here this afternoon and tried out a...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Siders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Assembly Speaker John A. Perez" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="California Democratic Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Election 2012" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>SAN DIEGO -- Assembly Speaker <strong>John A. P&eacute;rez</strong> may be nowhere more popular than at a labor caucus meeting at a Democratic convention, and so it was that he received a standing ovation here this afternoon and tried out a one-liner on the crowd.</p>

<p>"This year you've seen <strong>Mitt Romney</strong> and others talk about the fact that corporations are people," the former labor organizer said. "I won't believe corporations are people until Texas executes one of them."</p>

<p>Labor interests are a major force in the <strong>California Democratic Party</strong>, and as party activists arrived in San Diego today for their annual convention, P&eacute;rez said defeating a so-called "paycheck protection" measure is more important than any candidate election this year.</p>

<p>The ballot initiative would block unions and corporations from using automatic payroll deductions for political purposes. Supporters of the initiative say it will curb the influence of special interests in elections, while labor unions say it is a targeted effort to reduce their political clout. Labor unions spent millions of dollars helping Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> defeat billionaire <strong>Meg Whitman</strong> in the 2010 election.</p>

<p>"This ballot measure is a fraud, it's phony and it's a lie," said <strong>Art Pulaski</strong>, executive secretary-treasurer of the California Labor Federation. "Imagine, just for a moment, a California where your mouths were taped the next time a Meg Whitman ran for governor."</p>

<p>P&eacute;rez, D-Los Angeles, said Democrats will "fight like hell" to defeat the measure.</p>

<p>"Thank you, brothers and sisters," he said. "It is good to be in the house of labor."</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gov. Jerry Brown signs bill restoring school-bus money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/gov-jerry-brown-signs-bill-restoring-school-bus-money.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51323</id>

    <published>2012-02-11T00:56:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-11T00:56:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Gov. Jerry Brown today signed legislation restoring $248 million for school buses after rural and urban districts complained that the midyear cut would sink their budgets. Senate Bill 81 replaces the $248 million bus cut with an across-the-board reduction of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin Yamamura</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bills (2011-2012 session) " scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/169902_Rural-Schools_SIK_Death%20Valley%20School%20Bus.JPG"><img alt="169902_Rural-Schools_SIK_Death Valley School Bus.JPG" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/assets_c/2012/02/169902_Rural-Schools_SIK_Death Valley School Bus-thumb-380x253-22995.jpg" width="380" height="253" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a>Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> today signed legislation restoring $248 million for school buses after rural and urban districts complained that the midyear cut would sink their budgets.</p>

<p><a href="http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0051-0100/sb_81_bill_20120202_enrolled.html" target="_blank">Senate Bill 81</a> replaces the $248 million bus cut with an across-the-board reduction of roughly $42 per student that affects all K-12 districts. Under the previous plan, the isolated <strong>Death Valley Unified School District</strong> would have lost $1,734 per student, while <strong>Davis Joint Unified</strong> would have lost less than $8 per student, according to the <strong>California School Boards Association</strong>.</p>

<p>The state's coalition of education groups, including teachers, school boards and administrators, supported the change, as did lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. The only opponents were charter schools and some suburban districts that stand to lose more under SB 81 than they did under the bus cut.</p>

<p>The bus reduction was triggered in December when fiscal forecasters determined California would fall $2.2 billion short of the optimistic revenue projections that Brown and lawmakers used last June.</p>

<p>Brown has proposed eliminating bus funding next school year and launching a new block grant for school districts that could pay for some of those costs. But lawmakers seem intent on trying to preserve earmarked school bus money next year.</p>

<p><em><strong>PHOTO CREDIT: </strong>Marlee Redwolf-Rave, 14, left, and another student get off a school bus at Timbisha Shoshone Tribe Reservation in Death Valley on Jan. 10, 2012, after a long drive from Death Valley High school in Shoshone. (Irfan Khan/ Los Angeles Times.)</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>VIDEO: John Burton can&apos;t imagine &apos;hit squad&apos; for Molly Munger</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/video-john-burton-no-hit-squad-for-molly-munger.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51317</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T23:39:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T23:39:38Z</updated>

    <summary>SAN DIEGO -- California Democratic Party Chairman John Burton agrees with Gov. Jerry Brown that Molly Munger&apos;s November tax initiative could hurt the governor&apos;s bid to raise the state sales tax and income taxes on California&apos;s highest earners. Too many...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Siders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="California Democratic Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Election 2012" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gov. Jerry Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>SAN DIEGO -- California Democratic Party Chairman <strong>John Burton</strong> agrees with Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> that Molly Munger's November tax initiative could hurt the governor's bid to raise the state sales tax and income taxes on California's highest earners.</p>

<p>Too many tax measures on one ballot, the thinking goes, and wide-eyed voters might look at all of them and say, "No."</p>

<p>But the powers of a party chairman are not without limits.</p>

<p>"What are you going to do, you know, go get a hit squad to tell Molly Munger, 'We'll burn down your house if you don't do it?' " Burton told reporters this afternoon in San Diego, where state Democrats arrived for their annual convention.</p>

<p>Munger, the daughter of a business partner of <strong>Warren Buffett</strong>, has contributed nearly $1 million to her campaign, an initiative to raise income taxes on all but the poorest Californians.</p>

<p>Burton said he hasn't talked to her and wouldn't know her if he saw her. But if he called her about her initiative, he said, he thought the conversation might go something like this:</p>

<p>"You really want to do this?"</p>

<p>"Yeah."</p>

<p>"Why?"</p>

<p>"'Cause I wanna."</p>

<p>"OK."</p>

<p>Burton should know. He has proposed an initiative of his own, a tax on oil production, though even he said today that he is "of the opinion that more people would look favorably on the governor's proposals than the others."</p>

<p>A reporter asked Burton if he thought Munger's initiative, should it qualify, would doom Brown's.</p>

<p>"That's a good question," he said. "How in the hell would I know?"</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://media.vmixcore.com/vmixcore/embed?action=Media&ver=2.0&method=js&output=string&auto_play=0&player_id=137f32cf9bf42310022ec89408f9fef7&t=V01cWcZVwy0Ivjp-8y9rirOwrltOihOstN&width=316&height=269"></script></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Pelosi: Swing seats, strong candidates make California a 2012 &apos;battleground&apos; (VIDEO)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/nancy-pelosi-john-burton-california-congress-battleground.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51298</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T23:32:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-11T00:11:07Z</updated>

    <summary>SAN DIEGO -- While California may not see much action from presidential hopefuls, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi said today she believes a handful of competitive districts will make the state a &quot;battleground&quot; in Democrats&apos; effort to win back control...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Torey Van Oot</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="California Democratic Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Election 2012" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>SAN DIEGO -- While California may not see much action from presidential hopefuls, House minority leader <strong> Nancy Pelosi </strong> said today she believes a handful of competitive districts will make the state a "battleground" in Democrats' effort to win back control of Congress. </p>

<p>Democrats could pick up as many as five or six seats here next November under the state's new political maps, according to some political analysts. Victories in a handful of GOP-held districts could help Democrats win the 25 seats they need nationwide to reclaim the majority.  </p>

<p>Pelosi said strong candidates and registration edges in some of California's new districts will work to Democrats' advantage in 2012. </p>

<p>"We have many opportunites here because we were able to out-recruit the Republicans to run candidates who are real problem-solvers," she said during a news conference at the state Democratic Party convention in San Diego. </p>

<p>The party has identified nine seats that are potential pick-ups. Pelosi focused on three swing seats that have attracted only one high-profile Democratic candidate, including the newly drawn 7th Congressional District in the Sacramento region. </p>

<p>That race will be a rematch between GOP Rep. <strong> Dan Lungren </strong> and Democrat <strong> Ami Bera, </strong> a doctor and public health official from Elk Grove. </p>

<p>Bera attracted headlines for strong fundraising in his 2010 bid, but lost by seven percentage points in the swing district. Pelosi said she believes the now "battle-tested" candidate will be able to win under the new district lines, which give Democrats a one-point voter registration advantage. </p>

<p>"He has a personality and an agenda that really invigorates the grassroots and one of the most positive, enthusiastic grassroots operaitons in the country," she said. "He will have that again, even more so, more Democrats and (this year's) president at the top of the ticket." </p>

<p>CDP Chairman <strong> John Burton </strong> said high turnout in a presidential year and voters' disappointment with the GOP majority in the House will benefit Bera and other Democrats running in the state. </p>

<p>"It's just going to be a whole different chemistry this election," Burton said. "In fact, there are some pollsters that say ... this could be an absolute flip of 2010, that the people voted Republican, and they saw what they got, and they're suffering from what they call the buyers' remorse." </p>

<p>Lungren strategist <strong>Rob Stutzman</strong> said later that while the new district is more favorable to Democrats than the 2010 lines, he's "very confident still that Lungren is a vote-getter."</p>

<p>"It's going to be a very expensive race, but we're confident in prevailing," he said.</p>

<p>Stutzman said Democrats' pick-up prospects could be dimmed by their need to defend incumbents who are vulnerable under the new lines, such as Reps. <strong>John Garamendi </strong>and <strong>Lois Capps</strong>.</p>

<p>Democrats' optimism about the election outcome might not translate to big spending by House Democrats in California's targeted seats. Pelosi said while she expects candidates here to be well-funded, focus and resources will also be concentrated in other states with pick-up opportunities, such as New York, Illinois, Florida and Texas. </p>

<p><strong>Allan Hoffenblum</strong>, a former GOP strategist who now tracks California congressional and legislative races, said it's too early to tell whether Democrats will pick up many House seats here next November. Much of the outcome, he said, will depend on which Republican is on the top of the ticket. </p>

<p>"Right now, I (think) it could go either way, depending how strong the Republican candidate for president is," Hoffenblum said. "There is going to be significant turnover, but I don't want to place bets yet on is it going to be plus 'D' or plus 'R.'" </p>

<p><em><strong>EDITOR'S NOTE, 4:02 p.m.:</strong> This post was updated to add comment from Rob Stutzman.</em></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://media.vmixcore.com/vmixcore/embed?action=Media&ver=2.0&method=js&output=string&auto_play=0&player_id=c49d2b83ec1973ab1cd27b0330f5112a&t=V0gqY1eqyUYpkHLDpVLcya3y5KK8TKhTWZ&width=640&height=462"></script></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Judge dismisses last lawsuit challenging California districts </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/judge-dismisses-last-lawsuit-challenging-new-california-political-districts.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51309</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T21:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T21:47:36Z</updated>

    <summary>A federal judge has dismissed the last remaining lawsuit challenging California political districts drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission. U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Wilson concluded Thursday that he had no jurisdiction because the California Supreme Court previously rejected arguments...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Redistricting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has dismissed the last remaining lawsuit challenging California political districts drawn by the <strong>Citizens Redistricting Commission</strong>.</p>

<p>U.S. District Court Judge <strong>Stephen Wilson</strong> concluded Thursday that he had no jurisdiction because the <strong>California Supreme Court </strong>previously rejected arguments made in the suit by a former Republican congressman and four others.</p>

<p>Mariposa Republican <strong>George Radanovich</strong>, who left Congress last year, was challenging  the state's newly drawn congressional maps.</p>

<p>Radanovich contends that the redistricting commission violated federal voting rights law and the U.S. Constitution by seeking to protect three African American incumbents in the drawing of three congressional districts.</p>

<p>The state Supreme Court rejected similar arguments in October, without comment.</p>

<p><strong>Jeanne Raya</strong>, current chairwoman of the redistricting commission, said that Wilson's action protects the panel's work against "baseless partisan attacks" and demonstrates that its districts were fair and complied with state law.</p>

<p>The 14-member redistricting commission consists of five Democrats, five Republicans and four independent or minor-party members. Map approvals required support from at least three members of each bloc.</p>

<p>Dismissal of the federal suit ensures that the redistricting commission's legislative and congressional districts will be used in this year's elections. Signatures have been filed in a referendum drive aimed at overturning the Senate maps for future state elections. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Controller John Chiang: January revenues &apos;disappointing&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/controller-john-chiang-california-january-2012-revenues-disappointing.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51307</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T19:56:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T21:08:15Z</updated>

    <summary>California revenues last month lagged 5.5 percent behind what Gov. Jerry Brown expected in his just-proposed January budget, a development that Controller John Chiang termed &quot;disappointing.&quot; Though the big spring revenue months and Facebook&apos;s public stock offering are still to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin Yamamura</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="State budget" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>California revenues last month lagged 5.5 percent behind what Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown </strong>expected in his just-proposed January budget, a development that Controller <strong>John Chiang</strong> termed "disappointing."</p>

<p>Though the big spring revenue months and Facebook's public stock offering are still to come, <a href="http://sco.ca.gov/Files-EO/02-12summary.pdf" target="_blank">the latest report</a> may provide a cautionary signal for Democratic lawmakers who think Brown's forecast is too pessimistic.</p>

<p>According to Chiang's office, the state fell $528.4 million behind the governor's latest projection for January, including a $525 million (6.3 percent) shortage in income tax collections. After the first seven months of the fiscal year, the state is $694 million in general fund revenues, or 1.1 percent, behind Brown's latest plan to solve a $9.2 billion deficit through June 2013.</p>

<p>"January revenues were disappointing on almost every front," Chiang said in a statement.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The drop in January income taxes is due largely to lower estimated tax payments and more income tax refunds than expected in January, Chiang's report said. Withholdings were roughly on par with what Brown projected, coming in $19 million above.</p>

<p>Sales taxes were 5.6 percent higher than Brown expected for the month, which the report said "signals that consumers continue to spend money as the economic recovery picks up steam." Corporate tax revenues were $127.9 million shy of projections, or 48.8 percent.</p>

<p>When compared to the budget that Brown and lawmakers approved last year, built on outdated projections from last spring, the January revenue picture is uglier. Compared to that more optimistic budget, the state was $1.2 billion, or 11.9 percent, behind in January revenues. But Brown accounted for roughly $700 million of that in his latest deficit projection.</p>

<p>Chiang made a point of stating that despite the bad month, California won't run out of cash in March now that lawmakers have approved $865 million in borrowing from special state accounts earmarked for programs like transportation.</p>

<p>In a rare move, Brown's Department of Finance issued a <a href="http://t.co/9r28yeKs">two-page memo</a> responding to the controller's revenue report to assert that December and January data don't offer much guidance. </p>

<p>Finance acknowledged the "recent receipts are concerning." But the department also noted, "One quarterly payment - even when there is a significant variance between actual and forecast revenue - is just one data point, insufficient information to draw conclusions or arrive at informed judgments of what is to come."</p>

<p>Because quarterly payments are largely to blame, Finance suggested that some shareholders delayed selling their stock in late 2011 because the market was volatile. If they sell early this year - the S&P 500 index is up 6.76 percent already this year - Finance suggests the state could see stronger quarterly payments in April and June.</p>

<p><em>Post updated at 1:07 p.m. to include Department of Finance response.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Read chief justice&apos;s list of false claims from Assembly debate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/read-chief-justices-list-of-false-claims-from-assembly-debate.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51296</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T15:53:07Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T19:47:48Z</updated>

    <summary>Our story this morning on California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye&apos;s complaints about the Assembly&apos;s process in approving Assembly Bill 1208 referenced a list of 16 statements from the floor debate she said were &quot;meritless, false claims.&quot; Cantil-Sakauye sent the list...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Smith</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bills (2011-2012 session) " scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Our <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/10/4253096/california-supreme-courts-chief.html#mi_rss=State%20Politics" target="_blank">story</a> this morning on California Chief Justice <strong>Tani Cantil-Sakauye</strong>'s complaints about the Assembly's process in approving Assembly Bill 1208 referenced a list of 16 statements from the floor debate she said were "meritless, false claims."</p>

<p>Cantil-Sakauye sent the list to Assembly Speaker John A. P&eacute;rez, and the Administrative Office of the Courts has published the list on its website. Read them <a href="http://www.courts.ca.gov/16241.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>

<blockquote>

<p><a href="http://wms.1a57.edgecastcdn.net/001A57/eop/ccn/TCSRemarksSPEECHONLY.wmv" target="_blank">Click here</a> to download video of Cantil-Sakauye's speech to presiding judges. Requires a Windows Media file player.</blockquote>  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>GOP lawmaker takes aim at Democrats&apos; state budget power </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/california-republican-lawmaker-takes-aim-at-democrats-state-budget-power.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51278</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T15:23:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T17:02:02Z</updated>

    <summary>A Republican assemblyman announced Thursday that he will propose a constitutional amendment to require a supermajority vote by the Legislature to pass budget bills and to require the state controller to withhold lawmakers&apos; pay if an approved budget is not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bills (2011-2012 session) " scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A Republican assemblyman announced Thursday that he will propose a constitutional amendment to require a supermajority vote by the Legislature to pass budget bills and to require the state controller to withhold lawmakers' pay if an approved budget is not balanced.</p>

<p>The measure by Assemblyman <strong>Allan Mansoor</strong>, R-Costa Mesa, responds to a provision in voter-approved Proposition 25 that allows Democrats to pass a majority-vote budget needing no Republican support.</p>

<p>Proposition 25 also called for docking legislative pay when a budget is not passed by the June 15th deadline. But state Controller <strong>John Chiang</strong> sparked controversy last year when he withheld pay after concluding that the spending plan initially passed by lawmakers was not balanced.</p>

<p>Democratic legislative leaders, who contend that Chiang illegally intervened in legislative matters, filed suit last month asking a judge to decide whether the controller can punish lawmakers again this summer and in the future for budgets he deems unconstitutional.</p>

<p>Mansoor's constitutional amendment, if placed on the ballot by lawmakers and approved by voters, would settle the matter by requiring the controller to dock pay until the <strong>Legislative Analyst's Office</strong> certifies that a budget is balanced.</p>

<p>The ballot measure also would make Republicans more relevant in budget negotiations by requiring a two-thirds supermajority in each legislative house to pass a spending plan. Currently, that would require two GOP votes apiece in the Senate and Assembly.</p>

<p>Because Republicans are vastly outnumbered in the Legislature, Mansoor's proposal will be dead on arrival unless he can win support from Democratic colleagues whose party powers would be reduced if the constitutional amendment were to become law.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AM Alert: California Democrats to pick their primary colors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/am-alert-california-democrats-to-pick-their-primary-colors.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51267</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T14:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T03:28:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Let the endorsements begin: The California Democratic Party votes this weekend on its official candidate picks for the June 5 primary. The party&apos;s convention runs today through Sunday, with party Chairman John Burton and former White House aide Van Jones...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Micaela Massimino</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="AM Alert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let the endorsements begin: The <strong>California Democratic Party</strong> votes this weekend on its official candidate picks for the June 5 primary. </p>

<p>The party's convention runs today through Sunday, with party Chairman <strong>John Burton</strong> and former White House aide <strong>Van Jones</strong> kicking things off tonight in San Diego. Come back to Capitol Alert during the weekend for full coverage.</p>

<p>Political junkies will be paying close watch to Saturday afternoon's endorsing caucuses for districts in which no candidate got enough votes at the pre-endorsement conference to get recommended outright. That would include the <strong>31st Congressional District</strong>, where incumbents <strong>Howard Berman</strong> and <strong>Brad Sherman</strong> are slugging it out.</p>

<p>The rules are such that if two incumbents are running in the same district, a candidate will need a 60 percent vote in caucus to land an endorsement recommendation. Berman and Sherman are the only two incumbents running in the same district who will be considered by an endorsing caucus. </p>

<p>But wait, there's more. Incumbents who aren't facing another incumbent have a lower threshold to meet: 50 percent of the votes, plus one. That would include Assemblymen <strong>Richard Pan</strong> of Sacramento, who's running in the 9th Assembly District, and <strong>V. Manuel P&eacute;rez</strong> of Coachella, who's running in the 56th, neither of whom face caucus challengers.</p>

<p>Non-incumbents, meanwhile, need 60 percent to get a recommendation. That makes it a different story for the 50th Assembly District race, which is pitting incumbent <strong>Betsy Butler</strong>, who moved into the district, against challengers <strong>Torie Osborn</strong> and <strong>Richard Bloom</strong>. </p>

<p>You'll find the list of candidates eligible to participate in the endorsing caucuses <a href="http://www.cadem.org/admin/miscdocs/files/Endorsing-Caucus-Candidates.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. Party officials have posted a memo explaining caucus details <a href="http://www.cadem.org/admin/miscdocs/files/Endorsing-Caucus-Memo-020112.pdf" target="_blank">at this link</a>. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.cadem.org/admin/miscdocs/files/Official-Pre-Endorsement-Conference-Results.pdf" target="_blank">This link</a> will open up the official pre-endorsement list, which includes six legislative districts for which no endorsement recommendation was made. One of the orphans is the 8th Assembly District, an East Sacramento swing seat where Democrats <strong>Ken Cooley, Chris Parker</strong> and <strong>Larry Miles</strong> now face Republican contenders <strong>Barbara Ortega </strong>and <strong>Peter Tateishi</strong>.</p>

<p>Sen. <strong>Dianne Feinstein</strong> is speaking at Saturday's luncheon, <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/06/4241542/the-buzz-al-franken-will-be-live.html" target="_blank">as we've reported before</a>, and Sen. <strong>Al Franken</strong> of Minnesota is talking to the Saturday dinner crowd. Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> and House Minority Leader <strong>Nancy Pelosi </strong>are among those speaking Saturday morning. Find more information <a href="http://cademconvention.org/" target="_blank">at the party's website</a>.</p>

<p><em><strong>PET GROOMING:</strong></em> Sen. <strong>Juan Vargas</strong>, D-San Diego, is holding a presser at 11 a.m. at Nate's Point Dog Park in Balboa Park with pet groomers and pet owners to draw attention to his <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_969&sess=CUR&house=B&author=vargas" target="_blank">Senate Bill 969</a> (also called Lucy's Law, named for a dog) to regulate the pet grooming industry and to the San Diego County Board of Supervisors decision to oppose it. </p>

<p><em><strong>CAKE AND CANDLES:</strong></em> Sen. <strong>Joel Anderson</strong>, R-Alpine, turns 52 on Saturday.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Chief justice goes after Assembly, process over funding bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/california-supreme-court-chief-justice-tani-cantil-sakauye-assembly.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51277</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T01:59:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T01:59:29Z</updated>

    <summary>California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye is delivering an aggressive message to members of the Assembly after the lower house narrowly passed a bill that would strip power from the state Judicial Council she controls. In a 20-minute speech...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Smith</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bills (2011-2012 session) " scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/20120126_PK_CHIEF%20JUSTICE0135%20tani%20cantil-sakauye.JPG"><img alt="20120126_PK_CHIEF JUSTICE0135 tani cantil-sakauye.JPG" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/assets_c/2012/02/20120126_PK_CHIEF JUSTICE0135 tani cantil-sakauye-thumb-175x269-22959.jpg" width="175" height="269" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a>California Supreme Court Chief Justice <strong>Tani Cantil-Sakauye</strong> is delivering an aggressive message to members of the Assembly after the lower house narrowly passed a bill that would strip power from the state Judicial Council she controls.</p>

<p>In a 20-minute speech to the state's presiding judges in the days after the Jan. 30 vote on Assembly Bill 1208, a stern-faced Cantil-Sakauye said she was "greatly dismayed" at the "meritless, false claims" in the floor debate and the voting process in the Assembly.</p>

<blockquote>

<p><a href="http://wms.1a57.edgecastcdn.net/001A57/eop/ccn/TCSRemarksSPEECHONLY.wmv" target="_blank">Click here</a> to download video of Cantil-Sakauye's speech. Requires a Windows Media file player.</blockquote></p>

<p>"It's one thing to lose an argument based on merit," Cantil-Sakauye said, "it's another thing when the facts are not represented."</p>

<p>She said she expressed her displeasure after the vote in a phone conversation with Assembly Speaker<strong> John A. P&eacute;rez,</strong> who supported the bill.</p>

<p>She also said she was surprised that, with the bill in limbo and eight votes short of passing at 33-23, P&eacute;rez apparently helped round up the deciding votes for the 41-26 outcome.</p>

<p>"Because of my previous conversations with the speaker I thought for the most part then it would go away, because I understood that this bill would be up to each member to vote their conscience, that it wouldn't be the subject of political maneuvering...on the Assembly floor," Cantil-Sakauye said. "And that of course disturbs me, but I know our process is very different from the legislative process."</p>

<p>P&eacute;rez's office did not respond to requests for comment.</p>

<p>Cantil-Sakauye said the process "really called into question" the meaning of separation of powers. "That line has been and very well could be blurred based on the conduct and the involvement that occurred not only leading up to the bill, but how it squeaked out...of the Assembly. I don't know that anyone can stand tall after that process or claim a mandate after that process."</p>

<p>AB 1208 is pushed by a group of judges called the <strong>Alliance of California Judges</strong> and is backed by <strong>Service Employees International Union</strong>, representing courthouse employees.</p>

<p>The bill is stalled -- for now -- in the Senate. Cantil-Sakauye said she would continue pushing to kill the measure.</p>

<p>"That's my hill," she told the judges. "There are few hills as a judge. As you all know, we're neutral, we're objective, we're fact-finders. We left that persona (as advocates) behind a long time ago, but it is kind of funny how it comes back to you. Pretty quickly actually, about how when you're fighting for a value, or a principle you think threatens what you stand for, what you took an oath for."</p>

<p><em><strong>PHOTO CREDIT: </strong>California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye visits The Bee on Jan. 26, 2012. Paul Kitagaki Jr. / Sacramento Bee</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Jody Patel named interim administrative director of state courts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/jody-patel-named-interim-administrative-director-california-state-courts.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51280</id>

    <published>2012-02-10T01:22:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-10T01:22:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Jody Patel, former executive officer of Sacramento Superior Court, was named interim administrative director today of California&apos;s court system. Patel replaces Ronald G. Overholt, who resigned after serving in the post for about five months, as reported here. Patel quickly...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Appointments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Jody Patel</strong>, former executive officer of Sacramento Superior Court, was named interim administrative director today of California's court system.</p>

<p>Patel replaces <strong>Ronald G. Overholt</strong>, who resigned after serving in the post for about five months, <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/california-state-court-system-interim-director-resignation.html" target="_blank">as reported here</a>.</p>

<p>Patel quickly announced that she has no plans to serve permanently. A nationwide search currently is under way to find a permanent administrative director.</p>

<p>Chief Justice <strong>Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye</strong> announced that the state Judicial Council had approved Patel's interim appointment.</p>

<p>Patel had been serving as regional administrative director of California's state court system. She was the executive officer of Sacramento Superior Court from 2001 to 2006.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CA court system seeks new interim head after resignation today</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/california-state-court-system-interim-director-resignation.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51270</id>

    <published>2012-02-09T22:55:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-09T23:16:30Z</updated>

    <summary>Saying that his position has become a &quot;lightning rod for controversy,&quot; Ronald G. Overholt resigned today as interim administrative director of California&apos;s court system. Overholt&apos;s move comes as the court system&apos;s statewide decisions have come under increasing fire and a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bills (2011-2012 session) " scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Saying that his position has become a "lightning rod for controversy," <strong>Ronald G. Overholt</strong> resigned today as interim administrative director of California's court system.</p>

<p>Overholt's move comes as the court system's statewide decisions have come under increasing fire and a group of dissident judges is pushing <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_1201-1250/ab_1208_bill_20110518_amended_asm_v97.html" target="_blank">Assembly Bill 1208</a> to grant local courts more control over spending.</p>

<p>Overholt, in a written statement, noted that courts have operated for the past three years in an "anxiety-generated climate" of fiscal crisis that has prompted ongoing budget reductions and internal reorganization efforts.</p>

<p>"My decision is based on a number of factors," Overholt said of his resignation.</p>

<p>"Among them is that the position of administrative director of the courts has become a lightning rod for controversy, impacting the focus on budget discussions, Judicial Council governance of the judicial branch, and the Administrative Office of the Courts itself."</p>

<p>California Supreme Court Chief Justice <strong>Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye</strong> called Overholt's decision "understandable but unfortunate."</p>

<p>Overholt's 30 years of service in court administration, including his stint as interim administrative director since September 2011, have been exemplary and his departure is a great loss to the state's judicial system, Cantil-Sakauye said.</p>

<p>"But we respect his judgment that a transition is necessary at this time for him and for the court system he has served so well," she said.</p>

<p>A new interim director will be selected while a national search continues for a permanent director.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Steinberg &apos;committed&apos; to passing pension reform before budget</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/darrell-steinberg-pension-reform-before-california-state-budget.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51266</id>

    <published>2012-02-09T22:25:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-09T22:25:35Z</updated>

    <summary>Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said today that a nonprofit group&apos;s decision to scrap a proposed ballot initiative targeting public employee pensions does not alter his commitment to tackle that issue. &quot;We are committed to getting pension reform done,&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Senate leader Darrell Steinberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="State budget" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Senate President Pro Tem <strong>Darrell Steinberg</strong> said today that a nonprofit group's decision to scrap a proposed ballot initiative targeting public employee pensions does not alter his commitment to tackle that issue.</p>

<p>"We are committed to getting pension reform done," the Sacramento Democrat said in a news conference.</p>

<p>Steinberg said he anticipated the question after the advocacy group, <strong>California Pension Reform</strong>, announced Wednesday that it was shutting down its effort to place a pension initiative before voters this year.</p>

<p>Steinberg said he is committed to passing pension reform before adoption of a state budget this year.</p>

<p>The Senate leader said he intends to address all 12 points of a pension overhaul proposed by Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong>, but added, "That doesn't mean we're going to do every point in the way he suggests."</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Key elements of Brown's plan would raise the retirement age to 67 for most new employees outside the public sector and replace defined-benefit pensions with a "hybrid" system combining a smaller defined-benefit plan with Social Security and a 401(k)-style benefit.</p>

<p>"We think we can deal with the hybrid issue, we think we can deal with the retirement age issue," Steinberg said, without elaborating. "We're going to move forward and get that done."</p>

<p>As an example of how the Senate might alter Brown's plan, Steinberg said, "There are different ways to do a hybrid, for example."</p>

<p>"Our attention will be paid on making sure that when we do come forward with a proposal, it will not reduce benefits for middle- and low-income workers," Steinberg said.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AM Alert: Jerry Brown hits the road for Tesla Motors&apos; Model X</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/am-alert-jerry-brown-tesla-motors-model-x-los-angeles.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51234</id>

    <published>2012-02-09T14:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-09T01:50:07Z</updated>

    <summary>Gov. Jerry Brown will be making an appearance tonight as electric-car maker Tesla Motors unveils a new vehicle in Los Angeles County -- its Model X. California&apos;s clean-car makers are among the state&apos;s economic bright spots. And as The Bee&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Micaela Massimino</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="AM Alert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> will be making an appearance tonight as electric-car maker <strong>Tesla Motors</strong> unveils a new vehicle in Los Angeles County -- its Model X.</p>

<p>California's clean-car makers are among the state's economic bright spots. And as The Bee's <strong>Rick Daysog</strong> <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/28/4221378/state-air-board-tightens-vehicle.html" target="_blank">reported last month</a>, the <strong>California Air Resources Board</strong> has voted unanimously to tighten emissions standards by mandating  that one in every seven cars sold in the state in the year 2025 be an ultra-low- or zero-emission vehicle.</p>

<p>Brown is expected to speak around 8 p.m. at the premiere, held at Tesla's Los Angeles Design Studio in Hawthorne. </p>

<p>The Model X is a luxury SUV crossover, according to an <a href="http://news.investors.com/Article/600566/201202081933/tesla-motors-partners-with-toyota-daimler.htm" target="_blank">article posted Wednesday</a>  by Investor's Business Daily, which says Tesla has been teaming up with <strong>Toyota</strong> and <strong>Daimler</strong>, with Toyota using a Tesla power train in an electric RAV4, and Daimler putting Tesla-designed battery systems in some of its vehicles. </p>

<p>"As essentially a tech startup ... Tesla is a rarity in the car world. How well it does over the long haul is tied to interest from larger automakers, electric-car adoption and the price of oil," the article says. </p>

<p>Back in Sacramento, Capitol denizens can instead contemplate the joys of beef noodle soup. Democratic Assemblyman <strong>Richard Pan</strong> of Sacramento and Sen. <strong>Leland Yee</strong> of San Francisco are hosting a cooking demonstration of the Taiwanese signature dish featuring the winner of the 2011 international competition in Taipei. </p>

<p>Chef <strong>Hou Chun-Sheng</strong> will give his take at Spataro restaurant on L Street across from the Capitol, starting at 2 p.m. Spataro's <strong>Randy Paragary</strong> will also be on hand, as well as members of the Sacramento chapter of the <strong>California Restaurant Association</strong>. </p>

<p>Hou has become a big deal in Taiwan, and his champion recipe incorporates a rich beef broth, tomato paste, fermented bean curd sauce, hot chile peppers, and a bag of herbs and spices including star anise, cinnamon sticks, dried orange peel, and some stuff Capitol Alert hasn't heard of. </p>

<p>The <strong>Senate</strong> and the <strong>Assembly</strong> have both set floor sessions at 9 a.m. Beef noodle soup is not on the agenda. <a href="http://senate.ca.gov/dailyfile" target="_blank">Click here</a> for more details on the Senate side, and <a href="http://assembly.ca.gov/dailyfile" target="_blank">click here</a> for the Assembly.</p>

<p>The <strong>Peace and Freedom Party</strong>, meanwhile, is unhappy that Secretary of State <strong>Debra Bowen</strong>'s office left two of its four candidates off the <a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2012-elections/june-primary/pdf/generally-recognized-president-2012.pdf" target="_blank">list of generally recognized candidates</a> for the June 5 presidential primary. The California party chair, <strong>C.T. Weber</strong>, has called a presser at 10 a.m. at Bowen's office, 11th and O streets. </p>

<p>There could be good reason for the move, though. A Bowen spokeswoman told The Bee's Torey Van Oot on Wednesday that websites giving information about one of the omitted candidates, <strong>Peta Lindsay</strong>, indicated that she isn't old enough under the U.S. Constitution to be president. (For the record, a president must be at least 35 at the time of inauguration.)</p>

<p><em><strong>CAMPAIGN WATCH:</strong></em> Senate Republican leader <strong>Bob Huff</strong> is hosting a fundraiser tonight at Power Balance Pavilion for his 29th Senate District re-election bid. Single tickets to watch from a private suite as the the Sacramento Kings play Oklahoma City Thunder run $2,000 each. If you're strapped for cash and still want to go, <a href="http://www.stubhub.com" target="_blank">StubHub</a> had more than 400 tickets available for the game as of Wednesday evening. Starting price: $15.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>High-speed rail touted in jobs coalition&apos;s new radio campaign</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/02/high-speed-rail-touted-in-jobs-coalition-new-radio-campaign.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.sacbee.com,2012:/capitolalertlatest//41.51230</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T21:29:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T22:18:07Z</updated>

    <summary>A coalition representing Northern and Central California contractors and union construction workers launched a radio campaign this week applauding the state&apos;s proposed high-speed rail system. The group&apos;s 60-second spots, narrated by comedian Will Durst, are running at least twice daily...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Sanders</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="High-Speed Rail" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/High%20Speed%20Rail%20Station.JPG"><img alt="High Speed Rail Station.JPG" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/assets_c/2012/02/High Speed Rail Station-thumb-380x201-22933.jpg" width="380" height="201" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a>A coalition representing Northern and Central California contractors and union construction workers launched a radio campaign this week applauding the state's proposed high-speed rail system.</p>

<p>The group's 60-second spots, narrated by comedian <strong>Will Durst</strong>, are running at least twice daily -- during morning and evening commutes -- on six Sacramento and nine Bay Area radio stations.<br />
            <br />
The spot by the <strong>California Alliance for Jobs</strong> <a href="http://rebuildca.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ebuildCA_ORG_HighSpeedRail.mp3" target="_blank">can be heard here</a>.<br />
         <br />
The group's push to rally public opinion comes at a time when the planned high-speed rail system is coming under increasing criticism, sparking efforts to kill it in the wake of a state auditor's report that questions its financing and ridership projections.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>"I think the high-speed rail project is a game changer for California's economy down the road," coalition executive director <strong>Jim Earp</strong> said of the bullet train system to connect Northern and Southern California.<br />
              <br />
"It's one of those infrastructure projects that will have as much impact on California long-term as the original railroads did," Earp said.<br />
            <br />
Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong>, who is trying to push the project through the Legislature this year, said recently that he is redesigning the high-speed rail system -- estimated to cost $100 billion -- in a way that would cut its costs.<br />
             <br />
Earp said the high-speed rail radio spots are part of an ongoing, multiyear campaign touting projects that would hike employment during California's rocky economic times.<br />
             <br />
The following is a transcript of the minute-long high speed rail spot:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>"Hey guys, Will Durst here. Let's talk about vision -- and when I say vision, I'm not talking about some guy doing Lasik surgery in a van down by the river. I mean looking at the future and doing something positive to affect it. And that's why I was happy to hear Governor Brown's vision for high-speed rail. </p>

<p>"As with any project of this scope, there are problems to overcome, but we can do this. You know, in 1939, naysayers called the proposed interstate highway system 'New Deal, jitterbug economics.' In 1966, some called the planned BART system a billion-dollar fiasco.</p>

<p>"There will always be skeptics. Heck, some people would vote against sunshine and hugs. But we need a fast, green, inviting way to move around California. Are we going to let this great project be sunk by the naysayers or elevated by the visionaries? It's time to do the right thing - put people to work now and build something momentous for our future."</blockquote></p>

<p><em><strong>PHOTO CREDIT: </strong>A view of the interior of a station in the proposed high speed rail network. Rendering by Newlands and Company Inc. Sacramento Bee file, 2008.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

