SUBSCRIBE: Internet Subscription Special
After saying he would not endorse anybody a few weeks ago, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced his support for Sen. John McCain today. In an interesting twist, he used his overly hyped endorsement of McCain to draw attention to a Los Angeles company, Solar Integrated Technologies, that is growing amid the current economic downturn.
"You are creating jobs. You are protecting the environment and you are fighting global warming," the governor said, apparently hoping to draw attention to his efforts to grow the clean-tech economy.
"That is music to my ears, and it is music, I know, to Sen. McCain's ears," the governor said while standing with McCain and Rudy Giuliani at the Los Angeles company. "The future is clean technology, energy independence and green investment."
Solar Integrated specializes in solar roofing systems, and has contracts with Tesco, Toyota, Coca-Cola and other companies.
You can listen to the governor's comments here and read an account of the governor's endorsement here.
Associated Press photo
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 01:19 PM | Comments
Much to my surprise, all the remaining GOP candidates seem to support efforts by California and other states to enact a clean cars law that reduces greenhouse emissions. That's the consensus after watching McCain, Romney, Huckabee and Paul at last night's debate hosted by CNN.
You can read the candidate's statements here in The Bee, and also in a helpful dispatch from the Grist.
CORRECTION: After making it seem like he supported California's law, Romney backtracked after the debate. His campaign issued a statement saying that carbon dioxide should be regulated federally.
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 10:47 AM | Comments

U.S. Sen. John McCain enjoyed a gator-sized boost in Florida after he earned the endorsement of Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican governor who, like McCain, has made climate change a big part of his policy platform.
That raises the obvious question: Will Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger now endorse McCain? And why hasn't he done so already?
Of all the GOP contenders, McCain has an energy and global warming platform that is in line with that of Schwarzenegger's. The California governor seemed to be hedging his bets while Rudy Giuliani was in the race, but Rudy dropped out yesterday and endorsed McCain.
So what is Schwarzenegger waiting for?
It could well be that McCain doesn't want Schwarzenegger's endorsement as he trolls for conservative votes. Nonetheless, CNN ran a piece today speculating that Schwarzenegger may endorse McCain today or tomorrow. CNN's Wolf Blitzer is plugging an interview with the governor "coming up" at any moment.
UPDATE: Schwarzenegger didn't take the bait. Pressed by the bearded Blitzer, the governor declined to say if he will endorse McCain, or endorse anyone, before or after the Feb. 5 primary. "I have nothing to announce today," the governor said.
UPDATE #2: The Bee is reporting that Schwarzenegger is "set to endorse McCain."
Associated Press photo
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 03:35 PM | Comments
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney won the Michigan primary after telling his home-state voters he would oppose tougher fuel economy standards, which he claims could hurt the U.S. auto industry.
Yet while he was governor of Massachusetts, Romney and his appointees approved new motor vehicle emissions standards, modeled after California's clean car law, that effectively would force automakers to improve fuel efficiency.
They even bragged about it in a press release.
Where does Romney stand now on California's clean cars law?
The Bee queried his campaign on that question, but did not get a response. John Edwards and Barack Obama, on the other hand, provided responses. You can read their statements here in a recent editorial by The Bee.
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 04:18 PM | Comments
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said today he is disappointed that the presidential candidates aren't addressing solutions to global warming in the ongoing primary campaign.
"I don’t hear, in a presidential debate, the question even being asked," Schwarzenegger said today in a meeting with The Sacramento Bee editorial board. "On the Democratic side it is being asked, but on the Republican side it is not being asked."
He also took a shot at the Bush administration for not doing more to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and imported oil.
"This administration has just not done it, and an extraordinary opportunity was lost because of it," the Republican governor said.
To read a transcript of the governor's comments on climate change and the presidential race, go to jump of this item.
Sacramento Bee Photo/Renee C. Byer
Continue reading "Exclusive: Schwarzenegger bummed that candidates aren't addressing climate change"
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 06:50 PM | Comments
Unless California can get quick action from the courts, it may have to wait until 2009 to implement a 2002 "clean cars" law for which the Bush administration has refused to grant a waiver.
That means the next president will likely decide on whether California and 16 other states can set their own standards on greenhouse gases emitted from automobiles -- effectively creating a national standard.
So where do the presidential candidates stand on granting the waiver?
As far as I can tell, that question hasn't yet been directly posed to the candidates. Hunkered down in Iowa and New Hampshire, they have been understandably focused on more high-profile matters, such as their stands on Iraq, national security and health care reform.
Nonetheless, the waiver issue deserves attention as the candidates prepare for the Feb. 5 California primary. Their positions will reveal much about how they view state-federal perogatives, and how likely they will bow to the interests of Detroit in setting environmental policies.
To that end, I sent this question last week to the campaigns of 10 leading candidates running for president:
The question is one of three The Bee editorial page sent to the campaigns as research for an upcoming special section on the primary. (The other questions involving immigration and strategies for reducing foreclosures.) All 10 candidates have a Jan. 14 deadline in which to respond. On the list were Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Bill Richardson, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Rudy Guiliani, Fred Thompson, Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee.
If you want to track where the candidates stand on climate change issues in general, go to:
The Council of Foreign Relations web site
The New York Times climate chart
Grist "Compare the Candidates"
Have other sites? Lemme know.
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 02:48 PM | Comments
Lawyers for California apparently are not suffering from any New Year's Day hangovers.
They are in federal court today in San Francisco, filing a promised lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its decision not to grant a waiver for California's clean cars law. SacBee has the story here.
The suit comes a few days after the EPA's general counsel ordered agency employees to assemble all documents related to the waiver decision, in response to requests from Congress. You can see the EPA's counsel's memo here, along with other documents, on the web site of the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
Update: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger just released this statement:
And Attorney General Jerry Brown had this to say:
EXTRA UPDATE: The Air Resources Board today released a technical assessment to buttress the state's position that California's clean cars law would be more effective in reducing greenhouse gases than the new fuel economy standards.
By 2016, the report states, the California law would prevent a total of 58 million metric tons of CO2 from being emitted into the air as compared to 20 MMT from the new new federal standards. By 2020, the estimated reductions would be 167 MMT from the California law and 76 MMT from the California standards.
Apparently, some ARB staffers were working overtime during the holidays.
Posted by Stuart Leavenworth at 10:16 AM | Comments
March 2008 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Schwarzenegger panel proposes "carbon trust" to push early reductions
Budget Nun takes aim at Schwarzenegger's AB 32 funding
Perata letter to Mary Nichols
Big day for California in implementing its global warming law
Air board launches its Noah's Ark: The scoping plan
White House uses California as a shield in defending its climate policies
New CARB chief: "It's good not to surprise your boss."
Early action measures approved
Babin's new spin on Schwarzenegger's green image
Schwarzenegger and McClintock heat up the air at GOP convention
Nichols tries to turn this ship around
Thanks to GOP, Jerry Brown paints himself as climate crusader
Did Republicans get snookered?
Enviro concessions are the grease that gets budget passed
CARB gets closer to a baseline for CO2 emissions
Can we get real now?
One of Mary Nichols' first acts
Early action? Or delaying maneuver?
Note to governor: Engage Californians, not just Western governors
Senate plans "report card" on state agencies and emissions
Step up and report your emissions
Be very scared: Big Brother is coming after your car AC
Romney once supported Cal's clean car law, but now...?
Happy New Year -- and lawsuits
The Grinch didn't listen to his legal team
Senate passes energy bill after Feinstein "colloquy" stirs buzz
Strike three for the automakers
Delicious letter to the editor
Arnold @ LA Auto show: Applying pressure? Or greenwashing?
How will EPA justify rejecting the waiver?
SoCal fires delay global warming lawsuit
Are there alternatives to California's 2002 clean cars law?
Automakers lose in Vermont
Schwarzenegger to Bush: See you in court
Bush employee caught orchestrating backlash to CA laws?
I saw this one coming
Will state’s greenhouse laws kill more motorists?
No longer your father's Hummer hawker
Miles-per-gallon Monday
Biofuels take a bashing
Governor may face a biofuels backlash
What's Catherine Witherspoon up to?
Sawyer to Schwarzenegger: I hardly knew ye
Carb-gate won't die easily
Governor picks new CARB chair; independence an issue
CARB-gate continues to smolder
Scary movie continues: Witherspoon out, Assembly to probe ousters
Sawyer axed -- Witherspoon next?
Bellying up to the bar in Bali
Schwarzenegger, the salesman, goes national
California journalist wins Nobel Peace Prize
What's with the Bentley, gov?
Schwarzenegger -- the Statesmanator?
Wangari Maathai in Sac on Friday
Arnold to Michigan: "Get Off Your Butt"
Schwarzenegger calls US an "environmental problem"
No longer your father's Oldsmobile?
California registers more influence
Hey mate, want to engage in some wedge politics?
Schwarzenegger leans green on energy appointment
Truckee goes for the green
Dirty coal no more?
State senate passes bill to get more juice from renewables
More juice for nukes?
Concrete thoughts and damming musings on climate change
Year ender: What this blog is, and isn't, and how to comment
Transformative events, and some that didn't transpire
Back in the saddle
Preemptive memorial for Folsom Dam flood victims
Heat wave deaths, a surprise announcement, and Al Gore's carbon footprint
Tom goes to the dark side; Hot House to cool down
I'm here to pump you up
Back from the wilds
Hoodoo you love? Vacations...
Tuesday grab bag
Greenhouse grab bag
Jerry Brown: Hurtful? Or helpful?
San Bernardino settlement sets standard for local C02 programs
A comment that may come back to haunt him?
Budget deal: No bond lawsuits using CEQA
McClintock: Budget should not be held hostage to CEQA dispute
Oh, say can you CEQA?
Ironies abound in meltdown over state budget
Climate change: Fresh meat for legal beagles
Two new sites to check your carbon footprint: Shaq-size? Or smaller?
Is Sacramento serious about sustainability? New report offers a few clues
Where Angels no longer fear to tread
Environmental Justice groups declare war on carbon trading
Podunk East Coast paper launches "Environmental Capital"
Hayes: "Junk the term carbon offsets"
Market advisory report out
Market Advisory Report tomorrow
Business coalition hopes to plant seeds for cap-and-trade program
Market advisory committee releases recommendations
California registers more influence
Why won't the naysayers reveal themselves?
Reaction to items on Jerry Brown, CEQA
Why doesn't Jerry pick on state agencies?
Not-so-Hot House
Hot comments welcome
Hot stuff: Readers respond
Bio of Stuart Leavenworth
Will Schwarzenegger endorse McCain?
Schwarzenegger -- the smackdown continues
Governor to sign flood bills; Will they be enough?
As Schwarzenegger greens his image, the bills come due
Hard not to be bearish about the Arctic ice meltdown
Beside reading
Our swollen future
Insurers a driving force in responding to climate change?
Golden opportunity or fool's gold for the grid?
More juice for nukes?
Global Insecurity
Schwarzenegger issues sunny endorsement of McCain
Bush alone now in opposing California waiver
Exclusive: Schwarzenegger bummed that candidates aren't addressing climate change
Where do the presidential candidates stand on CA waiver?
Desmogging the climate denial industry
The ultimate "decider" on climate policy
Pelosi rejects lump of coal
Sneak attack on California's laws -- from coal country!
Bush endorses greenhouse targets, kinda; mum on Kyoto II
Ask not for whom the global warming bell tolls
News | Sports | Business | Politics | Opinion | Entertainment | Lifestyle | Cars | Homes | Jobs | Shopping
Contact Bee Customer Service | Contact sacbee.com | Advertise Online | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Help | Site Map
GUIDE TO THE BEE: | Subscribe | Manage Your Subscription | Contacts | Advertise | Bee Events | Community Involvement
Sacbee.com | SacTicket.com | Sacramento.com
Copyright © The Sacramento Bee, (916) 321-1000