<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Data Surfer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2008-10-02:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57</id>
    <updated>2009-11-20T20:07:36Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Spotlight on valuable information sources on the Web</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.25</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Despite subsidies, California class size is creeping up</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/despite-subsidies-california-c.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.27254</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T19:22:51Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T20:07:36Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[In 1996&nbsp;California legislators appropriated money&nbsp;to help local schools reduce the size of K-3 classes down to 20 students. Despite billions in subsidies since then, class sizes in most of the state's largest districts&nbsp;are rising again. That's the conclusion of a...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="schools" label="schools" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In 1996&nbsp;California legislators appropriated money&nbsp;to help local schools reduce the size of K-3 classes down to 20 students. Despite billions in subsidies since then, <a href="http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/articles/despitestatesubsidiesclasssizesbegintoriseagainincaliforniaschools">class sizes in most of the state's largest districts&nbsp;are rising again</a>. That's the conclusion of a recent investigation by the new nonprofit journalism&nbsp;team <a href="http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/projects/californiawatch/">California Watch</a>. CW&nbsp;examined the 30 largest K-12 districts and found that many schools&nbsp;have increased&nbsp;class size to 24 in some or all of the early grades. In some districts class size has grown to as high as 30 students. </p>
<p>The CW study is supplemented with <a href="http://www.centerforinvestigativereporting.org/articles/videohowarelargerclasssizesaffectingcaliforniateachers">video interviews</a>, a <a href="http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/articles/faqhowclasssizereductionworksincalifornia">FAQ</a> on the state school-reduction program and an <a href="http://www.centerforinvestigativereporting.org/files/class-size/ratio.html">infographic</a> comparing California's student-to-teacher ratio in K-12 schools to those in other states. There's also an <a href="http://www.centerforinvestigativereporting.org/files/class-size/districtMap.html">interactive map</a> displaying information on class size and state subsidy for the larger school districts including several in the Sacramento region.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Energy list helps you compare TV model efficiency</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/energy-list-helps-you-compare.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.27185</id>

    <published>2009-11-18T19:49:32Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-18T20:34:21Z</updated>

    <summary>The California Energy Commission today approved the nation&apos;s first energy-efficiency standards for televisions. The Commission estimates that TVs now account for 10 percent of household power consumption. And the new standards would save consumers $50-250 in electricity bills for the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="energy" label="energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="televisions" label="televisions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/2333066.html">The California Energy Commission today approved the nation's first energy-efficiency standards for televisions</a>. The Commission estimates that TVs now account for 10 percent of household power consumption. <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/TV_Standards_Facts.pdf">And the new standards would save consumers $50-250 in electricity bills for the life of each set</a>. </p>
<p>The power&nbsp;limit on TVs won't kick in until Jan. 2011, but consumers can choose to buy an efficient&nbsp;model&nbsp;before then. About 1,000 types of televisions in the market already comply with the California mandate. Here's a <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/2009_tvregs/documents/2009-09-25_TV_Model_List.pdf">helpful chart</a> showing the brand, model, screen type, size and energy drain of each one.&nbsp;The list is arranged alphabetically, but with some spreadsheet magic&nbsp;one can&nbsp;sort the models by size, then efficiency. See the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/TVenergy.xls">attached Excel file</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Hunger in America highest since survey started in 1995</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/hunger-is-america-highest-sinc.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.27162</id>

    <published>2009-11-17T23:53:25Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-18T15:00:02Z</updated>

    <summary>Hunger in the United States is measured by the U.S. Agriculture Department in terms of &quot;food insecurity,&quot; i.e. the percentage of households which--at some time during the year--&quot;were uncertain of having, or unable to acquire, enough food to meet the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Demographics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="food" label="food" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hunger" label="hunger" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hunger in the United States is measured by the U.S. Agriculture Department in terms of "food insecurity," i.e. the percentage of households which--at some time during the year--"were uncertain of having, or unable to acquire, enough food to meet the needs of all their members because they had insufficient money or other resources for food". In a <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/Foodsecurity/">recent report</a> the USDA annouced that 14.6 percent of U.S. households were food insecure in 2008. That's up from 11.1 percent in 2007 and is the highest level of food insecurity since 1995 when the national survey began. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/stats_graphs.htm">The USDA analyzed the households experiencing food insecurity along several factors</a>, including age, race, gender, marriage status,&nbsp;poverty status and presence of children. California's&nbsp;3-year (2006-08) average for food insecurity--12.0 percent--was close to the national&nbsp;average of 12.2.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/FoodSecurity/data/mapdata2008.xls">Among the states</a>, Mississippi was highest with 17.4 percent, North Dakota lowest with&nbsp;6.9.&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>NYT&apos;s notable health reform infographics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/nyts-notable-health-reform-inf.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.27060</id>

    <published>2009-11-13T22:04:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-13T23:58:53Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The New York Times&nbsp;has produced&nbsp;two health reform&nbsp;infographics that deserve mention. The first&nbsp;summarizes the recent House vote on H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act.&nbsp;In addition to the complete tally of each house member's position, the accompanying map shows...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Government and Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="healthcare" label="health care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="legislation" label="legislation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/">New York Times</a>&nbsp;has produced&nbsp;two health reform&nbsp;infographics that deserve mention. The first&nbsp;summarizes the <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/washington/story/78526.html">recent House vote</a> on <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3962:">H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act</a>.&nbsp;In addition to the complete tally of each house member's position, the accompanying map shows the geography of the&nbsp;vote&nbsp;with color-coding of each congressional district in the country. You get a good sense of where the Democrats&nbsp;who voted for and against the bill come from.</p>
<p>The other infographic is a&nbsp;well-illustrated NYT <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/07/19/us/politics/20090717_HEALTH_TIMELINE.html">timeline of attempts at health reform legislation in the United States</a>. It&nbsp;begins in 1912 with Theodore Roosevelt promising national health&nbsp;insurance while campaigning for President, and ends with the Oct.&nbsp;7 House vote.&nbsp;(Presumably the chronology will grow with new developments.)&nbsp;Most of the timeline entries are supplemented with historic Times news clippings. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Study identifies states facing California-like fiscal challenges</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/study-identifies-states-facing.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26989</id>

    <published>2009-11-11T22:08:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-12T01:10:11Z</updated>

    <summary>Misery loves company. So with California facing yet another budget shortfall, it&apos;s comforting (if that&apos;s the appropriate emotion) to know that several other states are in the same fiscal pickle. The Pew Center on the States today released a study...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Government and Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="budget" label="budget" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="california" label="California" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Misery loves company. So with California facing yet <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/2316115.html">another budget shortfall</a>, it's comforting (if that's the appropriate emotion) to know that several other states are in the same fiscal pickle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/">The Pew Center on the States</a> today released <a href="http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/report_detail.aspx?id=56044">a study identifying&nbsp;nine other states&nbsp;whose budgetary and economic troubles have approached&nbsp;California-like dimensions</a>. Pew&nbsp;scored all 50 states by six factors</p>
<ul>
<li>high foreclosure rate</li>
<li>increasing unemployment</li>
<li>decreasing state revenue</li>
<li>relative size of budget deficit</li>
<li>legal obstacles to balancing budget (such as a supermajority budget vote threshold)</li>
<li>poor money management practices</li></ul>
<p>and concluded that Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and <font color="#000000">Wisconsin</font> most match our state's fiscal challenges. This is troubling news for the nation recovery as a whole, since together <a href="http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/news_room_detail.aspx?id=55920">these 10 troubled states account for more than a third of U.S. population and economic output</a>.</p><font size="3" face="MyriadPro-Light"><font size="3" face="MyriadPro-Light"></font></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Sacbee redesigns its data and investigations sections</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/sacbee-redesigns-data-and-inve.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26938</id>

    <published>2009-11-10T20:22:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-10T20:42:40Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Over the weekend the online Bee launched redesigns of our Data Center and Investigations pages. The former aggregates all the valuable internal and external data sources (databases, interactive maps and charts) the Bee offers in an easy-to-browse listing. The latter&nbsp;showcases...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="sacramentobee" label="Sacramento Bee" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/the_scoop/2009/11/sacbeecom-has-redesigned-its-l.html">online Bee launched redesigns</a> of our <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/datacenter/">Data Center</a> and <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/investigations/">Investigations</a> pages. The former aggregates all the valuable internal and external data sources (databases, interactive maps and charts) the Bee offers in an easy-to-browse listing. The latter&nbsp;showcases current investigative journalism produced by Bee reporters.</p>
<p>Coinciding with this redesign is a new name for this blog. <em>I-Tool Tips</em> is now <em>Data Surfer</em>. We think the moniker better represents what the blog has become. (And it's sure easier to say!) The&nbsp;aim here is&nbsp;to spotlight the most relevant and credible data and research related to the news. As always, your comments and suggestions are most welcome.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The &quot;real&quot; unemployment rate -- you choose</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/the-real-unemployment-rate---.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26906</id>

    <published>2009-11-09T19:39:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-11T00:28:21Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Despite the&nbsp;uptick in the Gross Domestic Product, Friday's&nbsp;news that the national unemployment rate broke through 10 percent is a sober reminder that the recession is far from over. The 10.2 percent October jobless figure reported by the Bureau of Labor...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="unemployment" label="unemployment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Despite <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/business/story/2293192.html">the&nbsp;uptick in the Gross Domestic Product</a>, Friday's&nbsp;news that <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/838/story/2309958.html">the national unemployment rate broke through 10 percent</a> is a sober reminder that the recession is far from over. The 10.2 percent October jobless figure reported by the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> is the "official" unemployment figure generally quoted by politicians and the news media. But&nbsp;lately you see more stories and commentaries quoting a much higher rate of unemployment, the latest being 17.5 percent.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>But where does the other number come from? It turns out the BLS calculates not one, but six different jobless estimates. These are known in bureaucrat-speak as "<a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm">alternative measures of labor underutilization</a>"&nbsp;aka U-1 thu U-5.&nbsp;U-3 (total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian workforce) is the official govenment rate. That rose to 10.2 percent last month from 6.6 percent a year ago. U-6 (defined as total unemployed plus the marginally employed) is the most dire figure. That's the one that hit 17.5 percent in October, up&nbsp;from 12.0 percent&nbsp;the year before.</p><pre>&nbsp;</pre>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fiscal implications of legalizing pot</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/fiscal-implications-of-legaliz.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26847</id>

    <published>2009-11-06T01:13:33Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-06T14:54:57Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Last week the California Assembly Public Safety Committee held a hearing on a bill that allows marijuana to be taxed and sold legally to adults. The Board of Equalization estimates that pot&nbsp;sales could generate a whopping $1.4 billion net annual...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Government and Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="marijuana" label="marijuana" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/politics/story/2289970.html">the California Assembly Public Safety Committee held a hearing on a bill that allows marijuana to be taxed and sold legally to adults</a>. The Board of Equalization estimates that pot&nbsp;sales could generate a whopping <a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/legdiv/pdf/ab0390-1dw.pdf">$1.4 billion net annual revenue gain for the state</a>. But that's based on a lot of assumptions--none backed up by hard data.</p>
<p>A more sober <a href="http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/abouttheauthor.html">analysis of the budgetary impact of legalizing pot</a> was done in 2005 by Jeffrey Miron, a visiting Harvard economics professor. He concluded that lifting the prohibition on marijuana helps government budgets by generating tax revenue and&nbsp;saving money on enforcement. The national bottom line:</p>
<blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr">
<p>The [Harvard] report estimates that legalizing marijuana would save $7.7 billion per year in government expenditure on enforcement of prohibition. $5.3 billion of this savings would accrue to state and local governments, while $2.4 billion would accrue to the federal government.<b></b></p>
<p>The report also estimates that marijuana legalization would yield tax revenue of $2.4 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like all other goods and $6.2 billion annually if marijuana were taxed at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco.</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">Broken out by state, Miron estimated that California would save $981 million annually in law enforcement costs (including police, judicial and corrections expenditures), plus&nbsp;generate $105.4 million in additional state taxes. (Again these are 2005 projections.)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Two out of three U.S. taxpayers use e-File</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/11/two-out-of-three-us-taxpayers.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26798</id>

    <published>2009-11-04T22:36:37Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-04T23:01:37Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The Internal Revenue Service on Monday released fresh statistics on electronic filing of federal income tax returns. About 95 million out of 141 million individual returns were transmitted via the Internet in 2009. That's almost a nine point&nbsp;hike in the...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Government and Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="irs" label="IRS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="taxes" label="taxes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Internal Revenue Service on Monday released <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=214853,00.html">fresh statistics on electronic filing of federal income tax returns</a>. About 95 million out of 141 million individual returns were transmitted via the Internet in 2009. That's almost a nine point&nbsp;hike in the percent of e-Filers over last year.&nbsp;Since 2000, the proportion has grown from 27.57 percent to 67.18 percent. Some 66 percent of tax refunds in 2009 were received with direct deposit. That's up four percent from 2008.</p>
<p>In California <a href="http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutFTB/press/2009/release_24.shtml">more than 77 percent of individual and corporate income tax returns were filed electronically in 2009</a>. That's a 2.5 percent increase over last year. In addition, almost 45 percent of&nbsp;filers used direct deposit for refunds.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Daylight savings time ending too late this year?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/daylight-savings-time-ending-t.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26641</id>

    <published>2009-10-29T22:27:43Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-29T23:45:21Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I don't know about you, but daylight savings time seems to be ending very late this year.&nbsp;Actually it does&nbsp;end later than most of us remember as kids. (A federal law changed the end date from the last Sunday in October...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="daylightsavings" label="daylight savings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="time" label="time" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know about you, but daylight savings time seems to be ending very late this year.&nbsp;Actually it does&nbsp;end later than most of us remember as kids. (A federal law changed the end date from the last Sunday in October to the first Sunday in November starting in 2007.) This year the end of&nbsp;DST falls on Nov. 1. That's the earliest it can be (though it still seems really late this year.) But just wait until next fall: you'll have to wait til Nov. 7 to get relief from the morning darkness. </p>
<p>Here's a <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/daylightsaving.html#chart">handy chart</a> showing dates for the start and end of daylight savings time for years 1990 through 2015. It's compiled by the California Energy Commission which also provides an interesting <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/daylightsaving.html">article on the history and rationale for the time change</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Central Valley hit disproportionately by recession</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/central-valley-hit-disproporti.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26590</id>

    <published>2009-10-28T18:15:55Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-28T19:26:49Z</updated>

    <summary>California&apos;s Central Valley continues to be the bread basket of the nation, but lags behind the rest of the state and nation in the economic recovery. That&apos;s the conclusion of a new report just released by the nonprofit think tank...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Demographics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="centralvalley" label="Central Valley" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="2">California's Central Valley continues to be the bread basket of the nation, but lags behind the rest of the state and nation in the economic recovery. That's the conclusion of a new report just released by the nonprofit think tank <a href="http://www.greatvalley.org/">Great Valley Center</a>. <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=_2fDEgF1xmoEHN4XfjjhjSMA_3d_3d">State of the Great Central Valley: The Economy (Third Edition)</a> provides a statistical snapshop of the 19-county region stretching from Bakersfield to Redding. The report examines the Central Valley's economic health with 21 indicators organized under five general categories: population, income, and housing; business vitality; agriculture; transportation; and Federal and nonprofit spending. Based on these updated numbers, the GVC offers five broad strategies for improving conditions in the state's inland counties.<br /></font><font size="2"><font size="2" face="GalliardITCbyBT-Roman"><font size="2" face="GalliardITCbyBT-Roman"></p></font></font></font></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>U.S. Census Bureau unveils new web site for the 2010 count</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/us-census-bureau-unveils-new-w.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26534</id>

    <published>2009-10-26T20:30:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-26T21:07:08Z</updated>

    <summary> The U.S. Census Bureau is promoting the upcoming decennial survey of the nation with the launch of a new web site. Census2010 is a slick, multimedia resource directly mostly at average Americans to encourage them to fill out the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Demographics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Government and Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="uscensusbureau" label="U.S. Census Bureau" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<span style="DISPLAY: inline" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/census.jpg"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px; FLOAT: left" class="mt-image-left" alt="census.jpg" src="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/assets_c/2009/10/census-thumb-150x113-8594.jpg" width="150" height="113" /></a></span>The <a href="http://www.census.gov/">U.S. Census Bureau</a> is promoting the upcoming decennial survey of the nation with the launch of a new web site. <a href="http://2010.census.gov/">Census2010</a> is a slick, multimedia resource directly mostly at average Americans to encourage them to fill out <a href="http://2010.census.gov/2010census/how/interactive-form.php">the census questionnaire</a> that will be mailed to every residence next year. Part of the web site is intended to address <a href="http://2010.census.gov/2010census/about/whole.php">some of the myths and concerns circulating about the&nbsp;survey process</a>.&nbsp;But the overall aim is to remind&nbsp;people of <a href="http://2010.census.gov/2010census/why/index.php">the political, social and economic importance of an accurate count</a> for communities, states and country as a whole.</p>
<p>The 2010 census will depart from prior ones in that the Bureau will distribute only one <a href="http://2010.census.gov/2010census/how/interactive-form.php">short survey form with 10 questions</a>. In the past there have been two questionnaires: the so-called "short form," that everyone received, and the "long form," that went to a sampling of households. The long form has been replaced by the <a href="http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2009/pdf/09ACS_improve.pdf">annual American Community Survey</a> that asks many of the same questions about income, education, ancestry, marriage status, commuting, etc. The 2010&nbsp;abbreviated form is restricted to a few basic demographic factors: age, race, gender, children and whether the residence is owned or rented.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Track swine flu with state health department stats</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/track-the-swine-flu-with-state.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26490</id>

    <published>2009-10-23T22:44:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-23T23:18:45Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The recent death of a first-grader has prompted officals to close two Vacaville schools. Tests&nbsp;indicate the&nbsp;student had swine flu (H1N1), but the virus has not been confirmed as the cause of death. The California Department of Health continues to&nbsp;update statistics...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Health" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="swineflu" label="swine flu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The recent death of a first-grader has <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/2276740.html">prompted officals to close two Vacaville schools</a>. Tests&nbsp;indicate the&nbsp;student had swine flu (H1N1), but the virus has not been confirmed as the cause of death.</p>
<p>The California Department of Health continues to&nbsp;update <a href="http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/H1N1FluData.aspx">statistics on the H1N1 pandemic online</a>. As of Oct. 17, there have been a total of 3,556 hospitalizations, ICU cases and fatalities in the state. There have been 233 California deaths.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Documents/H1N1DataTable092609.pdf">This table</a> shows the extent of the disease in each county. Los Angeles County leads in number of hospitalizations and deaths, 331 and 33, respectively. Sacramento County comes in with 161 hospitalizations and&nbsp;eight deaths.&nbsp;Beginning Sept. 27, the Health Department committed to posting fresh stats every month.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>State, county school enrollment projected to 2018</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/state-county-school-enrollment.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26408</id>

    <published>2009-10-21T18:19:14Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-21T19:13:07Z</updated>

    <summary> The California Demographics Unit (the state equivalent of the U.S. Census Bureau) just unveiled their annual Public K-12 Graded Enrollment and High School Projections by County -- 2009 Series. This is a useful set of spreadsheets tracking elementary and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Demographics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="california" label="California" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="schools" label="schools" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<span style="DISPLAY: inline" class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img style="MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px; FLOAT: left" class="mt-image-left" alt="school.JPG" src="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/school.JPG" width="160" height="108" /></span>The California Demographics Unit (the state equivalent of the U.S. Census Bureau) just unveiled their annual <a href="http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/projections/k-12/2009/"><em>Public K-12 Graded Enrollment and High School Projections by County -- 2009 Series</em></a><em>. </em>This is a useful set of spreadsheets tracking elementary and high school student populations out to 2018. The main table breaks down past and&nbsp;future enrollment numbers by county and grade for the school years 1974-75 through 2018-19. </p>
<p>For most counties you see the K-12 population dropping slightly in the early 1980s and then steadily growing from that point on. Statewide the student&nbsp;demographic is expected to expand only 3.5 percent in the next 10 years. But on the county level the 10-year percent change varies widely from -14.3 percent in Nevada County to 39.9 percent in Riverside County. Placer County comes in second with a projected change of 32.0 percent. El Dorado, Yolo and Sacramento will grow moderately at 11.0, 9.8 and 9.4 percent, respectively.</p>
<p>[First grade class at Heron Elementary School in North Natomas reads a poem.&nbsp;Sacramento Bee / Renee C. Byer]</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>College Board releases higher-ed cost report</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/2009/10/college-board-releases-univers.html?mi_atom=Data%20Surfer" />
    <id>tag:www.sacbee.com,2009:/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips//57.26382</id>

    <published>2009-10-20T21:31:58Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-20T22:02:02Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The College Board released its annual report on&nbsp;higher ed&nbsp;costs which says&nbsp;(despite the recession) that&nbsp;the average tution at 4-year public colleges rose 6.5 percent to $7,020 between this school year and the last. California public colleges rose an average of 10.3...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Basofin</name>
        <email>pbasofin@sacbee.com</email>
        <uri>http://www.sacbee.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="colleges" label="colleges" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="costs" label="costs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/i-tool_tips/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trends-collegeboard.com/">The College Board</a> released its <a href="http://www.trends-collegeboard.com/college_pricing/index.html">annual report on&nbsp;higher ed&nbsp;costs</a> which says&nbsp;(despite the recession) that&nbsp;<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ifmMBwQfkudqXd4TNwtqlyHyVLXgD9BF1TOO7">the average tution at 4-year public colleges rose 6.5 percent to $7,020 between this school year and the last</a>. <a href="http://www.trends-collegeboard.com/college_pricing/2_4_tuition_fees_by_state.html?expandable=0">California public colleges rose an average of 10.3 percent to $5,996</a>. That puts&nbsp;California 34th among the states in terms of the cost of tuition, but eighth in terms of growth (percent change) of such costs from 2008-09 and 2009-10.</p>
<p>The cost of two-year college tuition in California is the cheapest in the nation ($817), so it's not surprising that it rose the most in the past year (28.9 percent).</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
