Kings Blog and Q&A

News, observations and reader questions about the Sacramento Kings and the NBA.

March 12, 2010
Down on Evans? Hardly

This will be the last time I react on this blog to radio rantings from the local afternoon sports talk show, and I'll tell you in a few days why I'm quite confident making that statement.

For now, though, there's some clarifying to do as it pertains to Tyreke Evans' sensational triple-double night on Wednesday and how in the world this game story led to what I was told was the perception that I'm down on Evans and don't want him to win the Rookie of the Year award.

What I want for all NBA-related accolades is for the voters (of which I am one) to get it right. And right now, that means Evans remains out front by a healthy margin, followed by Golden State's Stephen Curry and his intriguing second-half surge (yes, take note of the key phrase - second-half) and Milwaukee's Brandon Jennings. And what I really don't want, since that's such a popular topic, is Jennings getting too much credit for his team being in playoff position.

As Charles Barkley pointed out on TNT last night, guys like Andrew Bogut and John Salmons have a whole lot to do with the Bucks' success and Jennings - whose numbers simply don't compare to the likes of Evans and Curry - shouldn't luck into the ROY because of the talent around him. Case in point: the Bucks' March 3 win over Washington.

Jennings goes 2 of 12 with five assists and six turnovers, and Milwaukee wins going away. Ironically, Evans had a similar experience that same day, going 4 of 22 from the field as the Kings downed Houston. The difference, however, is that Evans has a much greater capacity to affect the game in other ways.

His assist-to-turnover ratio was five to one that day, and he certainly had something to do with the Rockets' backcourt of Aaron Brooks and Kevin Martin going a combined 12 of 38. Plus, what was an aberration for Evans - it was his second single-digit scoring game since Nov. 2; the other was a loss to Charlotte - has been far more routine for Jennings.

Before his last two outstanding games in wins against Cleveland and Boston, Jennings was at a 25.2 percent shooting clip (26 of 103) in his previous nine games (he is at a 36.8 shooting clip on the season). He is incredibly inconsistent, enough so that Bucks coach Scott Skiles must gauge the Jennings meter every time out before determining his somewhat-erratic playing time.

But I digress...

The original point is that I somehow killed Evans in that story, and that's the part that is just baffling. His was a phenomenal night, enough so that I intentionally left Beno Udrih and his outstanding contributions (24 points on 10 of 14 shooting, eight assists, two turnovers) out of the piece to focus on the Evans mania and how he lived up to the moment.

As for the mention that one of Evans' assists was questionable, even the player himself had fun with that topic (as well as TrueHoop network blogger Zach Harper in his breakdown). Asked about his sideline chat late in the fourth quarter with Kings radio color man/Mr. Triple Double former point guard Fat Lever, Evans said with a smile that he was openly campaigning for some stat-padding.

"I told him that they cheated me out of my (previous) assist," he said. "I gave Cisco a pass and he laid it up, and they're supposed to give me that. If I was Chris Paul, I would have got an assist, or Darren Collison (in reference to Collison's Assist Gate). Either one of those guys. I was just trying to get some more assists."

Asked by a radio reporter if he thought he would get his ninth assist if he was on the road, he said, "Umm, I don't know" while another radio reporter shook his head left to right and got a laugh out of Evans.

The larger point is this: questioning anything relating to Evans results in these kinds of reactions in Kings Land. There has been frustration all season long from the Kings that the local paper wouldn't put the cart in front of the horse and wanted to - imagine this? - actually do our jobs and analyze the team. You always got the strong sense that they wanted us to be sure and always call him a point guard, to not talk so much about how he often struggles to keep the ball moving or why his teammates get benched for saying things similiar to what he publicly said or how his jumper has a long ways to go.

It's a silly exercise, really, because he has earned a good amount of hype in our pages while already showing with his play that he is a unique and dynamic talent in just six short months as a pro. And as Kings director of player personnel/TV color man Jerry Reynolds constantly and accurately reminds me, let's remember that he's without question one of the best 20 year olds to ever play this game at the NBA level. The scary part? There's plenty of room for improvement.

He is, as I've already mentioned, the leading-by-a-longshot Rookie of the Year and a young man who is on the verge of becoming just the fourth player in league history to average 20 points, five rebounds and five assists per game as a rookie. For those of you who somehow haven't seen that stat yet, that's a club that only Michael Jordan, Oscar Robertson and LeBron James have access cards to.

Maybe it's just a matter of taste, but I would much rather take the measured and healthy approach to handling a young player as opposed to calling him great before he can legally go to a bar and waiting for him to live up to that unfair billing. I don't see that happening, though, and I suppose anyone who doesn't play that game will be treated accordingly. - Sam Amick

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

Kings Bloggers

Tag Cloud

[an error occurred while processing this directive]


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives