From: Cohen-Supple, Oriet <ocohen@cbmlaw.com>
Subject: Stipulation and Order re Preliminary Injunction
To: fourniersteve@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 6:27 PM

Dear Mr. Fournier:

My assistant, Kelli Bremer, emailed you this afternoon a notice of entry of the order issued by Judge Chang on Friday, January 22, 2010 granting CCPOA's ex parte TRO and OSC application.   A copy of Judge Chang's order which was attached to the notice of entry of order as Exh. A, was given it you by the judge's clerk after the ex parte hearing.  

As directed by Judge Chang's order of January 22, 2010, attached is the Stipulation and Order re Preliminary Injunction to which you agreed at the hearing. Please review, sign, and send me via email or fax your signature page no later than Wednesday, January 27, 2010 so we could file it with the court no later than Thursday, January 28, 2009. If you cannot email or fax it, please let me know immediately and I will arrange for picking it up from your house. Please call me at 415-200-9706 if you have any questions.

We cannot proceed with your deposition on the dates you have offered given conflicts I have with my other cases. Could you please let me know what dates would work for you between February 19 and March 12, 2010. Thanks. 

   ______  _____  
Regards,

Oriet Cohen-Supple
Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP
44 Montgomery St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Office: (415) 743-2551
Fax: (415) 989-0932
Cell: (415) 200-9706
ocohen@cbmlaw.com
Website: www.cbmlaw.com

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

From: Steve Fournier <fourniersteve@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Stipulation and Order re Preliminary Injunction
To: "OrietCohen-Supple" <ocohen@cbmlaw.com>
Cc: "Joe Bradley" <jb05855@comcast.net>, "John Baird" <jbaird1@bak.rr.com>, "Thomas Marich" <ccpoa1@hotmail.com>
Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 11:14 PM

THE DOCUMENT YOU HAVE SUBMITTED TO ME IS INACCURATE IN MANY PARTS AND I WILL NOT SIGN IT IN ITS PRESENT FORM.
I HAVE NO "DEFENDANTS" THAT I WORK IN CONCERT WITH AND WILL STATE ONE MORE TIME I STOLE NOTHING AND WILL SWEAR TO IT.
YOUR SUBORDINATE HAS TAKEN MANY LIBERTIES WITH A CONVERSATION SHE WAS NOT PARTY TOO, AND YOU HAVE ASSUMED THE SAME THINGS. WE HAD AN AGREEMENT TO THE DOCUMENTS AND NOTHING ELSE. I WILL NOT SIGN ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN SPIN TO MEAN THAT I VIOLATED THE PENAL CODE OR ANY OTHER LAW.
NO DEAL TRY AGAIN AND I REFUSE TO LIVE BY YOUR IMPOSED DEADLINES

I READ AN ARTICLE TODAY THAT SPOKE OF THIS TATIC, IT WAS MOSTLY ABOUT HOW WHEN THE ECONOMY GETS BAD LAWYERS GET INVENTIVE. NOT ON MY TIME YOU DON'T.

I GUESS I WILL JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE JUDGE IMPOSING THE TRO.
I WILL NOT ABIDE BY YOUR LANGUAGE.

BY THE WAY I WITHDRAW THE OFFER OF DEPOSITION, IT WAS NOT AN ORDER OF THE COURT, BUT THE JUDGE DID STATE BEFORE FEBRUARY 3, 2010.

I WILL BE SHARING THIS E-MAIL WITH EVERYONE I KNOW  TO SHOW THE WORK YOUR FIRM DOES, TWISTING AND TURNING WORDS I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT BETTER, AND I WAS WARNED.

STEVE FOURNIER