The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

November 13, 2008
Column extra: Some background on pay cuts, time off and holidays

With just 400 to 450 words for our weekly State Worker column, most of what we learn each week never sees print. Column Extras will give you some of the notes, the quotes and the observations that don't make the cut:

Info on pay reductions/furloughs
California has reduced state employee pay in the past. We asked DPA to provide a timeline and an explanation of cuts since the Wilson administration:

  • 7-1-91: 5% reduction for managerial employees
  • 10-1-91: 5% reduction for supervisory employees
  • 6-92: 5% reduction for managers and supervisors converted to PLP (explained below)
  • 7-1-92: PLP for rank-and-file
  • 12-31-92: PLP ends for managers
  • 3-31-93: PLP ends for supervisors
  • 12-31-93: PLP ends for rank-and-file
  • 7-1-03: PLP for managers, supervisors, and rank-and-file
  • 7-1-04: PLP ends
PLP, or personal leave program, gives employees an extra day of leave per month in exchange for about 5% of pay (because each day is worth about 5% of pay).


What's the deal with holidays?
Today's editorial in The Bee supports the notion of erasing two of the 13 paid holidays on the state calendar:

Those who object to trimming holidays ought to check with other employers. None we could identify are as generous as the state. Federal workers receive just 10 paid holidays a year. The state of Nevada gives its employees 11. Sacramento County workers get 12.

We've heard different versions of how the state arrived at 13 holidays. Literally dozens of state workers have told us in e-mails and online posts that the holiday calendar grew over the years because the state offered the paid time off instead of pay raises.

We couldn't confirm that. In fact, DPA's Lynelle Jolley said this in an e-mail:

The number of holidays has expanded over the years through collective bargaining. It's unrelated to the issue of trading time off for pay increases.

What no one disputes, however, is that the holiday schedule came through bargaining.

When unions have taken wage and benefits issues to the Legislature, the governor has blasted the tactic as an end-run on good faith negotiations. Now he has adopted that tactic.

Questions asked and unanswered
We usually start our reporting by asking questions and then seeking answers. Some that we had this time:

Are the unions so unyielding that reductions can't be worked out through bargaining? Or is there history (prior concessions, meager raises in past contracts, etc.) that makes union concessions extremely difficult?

Is the state cash crisis so severe and the prospects for concluding labor talks soon so remote that pushing a controversial measure through the Legislature makes sense?

What about the appearance of hypocrisy?

What do the governor's proposals do to current labor talks?


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives