The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

This in from the nascent Police Officers of California, the group trying to break off from CSLEA to form its own bargaining unit:

"We call for CAUSE / CSLEA to agree to hold a global election vote. If cops don't want out of CSLEA then a PERB conducted global election will prove that," said Bob Orange, President of P.O.C. "However, we are confident that Peace Officers want their own union."

The release, which you can read by clicking here, also quotes CSLEA President Alan Barcelona: "It is fortunate that our Constitution permits us to bill [Park Rangers & Game Wardens] attempting to sever the bargaining unit for the substantial litigation costs before PERB, so that those costs will not have to be paid by our members."

And POC says, CSLEA alleged petition card fraud.

We've blogged about the severance movement in CSLEA. It's a contentious issue that dredges up divisions from 20 years ago when CSLEA was known as CAUSE.

The POC release prompted us to get in touch with CSLEA Manager and Chief Counsel Kasey Clark. We asked him the following questions:

Any sense of how much it has cost/will cost CSLEA to litigate this?

The release mentions that CSLEA said the peace officers committed some sort of petition fraud. In the simplest terms possible, can you explain that charge, the PERB ruling and your reaction to it?

What impact, if any, is this having on contract talks?

Here is Clark's response:

Hey Jon--

Once again, I don't know that this is really a public interest story. I think POC is under the impression the press is giving them credibility.

As you have indicated previously, the POC founders are disgruntled with the severance process which consists of three phases:

(1) the proof of support phase which took POC three separate severance petition filings (the first two were dismissed due to insufficient proof of support) over the course of a year:

(2) the PERB litigation phase which consists of evidentiary hearings to determine whether the facts as applied to the legal authority proves that the proposed unit, i.e. one consisting of a large variety of different peace officer classifications, is more appropriate than the current make-up of Unit 7; and

(3) if, in the unlikely case PERB were to grant the petition for severance, an election to determine which organization the severed employees would like to represent them, which could be CSLEA, POC, any other labor organization who successfully intervenes, or no representation.

POC wants CSLEA to stipulate to the severance of the unit in order to avoid Step 2. However, ten of the twelve CSLEA Affiliate Boards which represent peace officers (with the exception of the affiliates representing Parks and Fish and Game) took a position of opposition to the severance because they recognized the severance was not in the best interests of their members ...

As for the fraud issue, this has been a concern of ours for some time. Presently the proof of support process has little protection to guard against fraud in the signature gathering process. In order to be valid, the card must have the name of an employee in an eligible position in the unit, be signed, and dated within one year from the filing of the petition.

PERB only conducts a cursory review to identify patent fraud, i.e. a number of cards appear to have an identical signature style. CSLEA is not privy to the cards and has no opportunity to examine them for fraud. PERB's cursory review apparently did not result in an indication of patent fraud.

Given that POC was coming up on a year since they began obtaining cards, there was a real potential that unless the third petition filing was accompanied by adequate proof of support, cards would begin expiring and POC would have to go back to those who signed cards and get them to sign a second card. This would likely be a major uphill battle as some Unit 7 peace officers who initially supported the move, have become disenchanted given POC's inability to submit a valid petition ...

.... CSLEA has the legal right to pay its costs in defending the action from dues that would otherwise be payable to the two affiliates who have supported the severance.

... when the severance campaign was initiated in September 2007, it had the potential to interfere with bargaining. However, the financial crisis has effectively eliminated any affect ...

CSLEA's litigation costs are being borne by the affiliates who pressing for severance. I would estimate the attorney's fees and costs on each side to be somewhere between $50K and $100K depending on how many days it actually takes to put on the case and how many witnesses will be called to testify, which will require travel and expense reimbursement.

Click here to read the full text of Kasey's responses to our questions.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz started The State Worker blog and column in 2008 as a member of The Bee's business staff, where he covered workplace and labor issues. He moved to the Capitol Bureau in January 2009 to cover state employment issues full time. Join him for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

Recommended Links

Categories


July 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Monthly Archives