The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

February 10, 2009
Nagging questions about the furlough

The way that just about every media outlet has dropped coverage of California's state worker furloughs, you'd think that it was a one-and-done deal. Obviously, it's not.

If Sacramento Superior Court Judge Patrick Marlette's ruling in support of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's emergency furlough power stands up to appeals, we think it's a potential game changer that shifts more power to set workplace conditions to the executive -- and away from the Legislature and the unions.

So how the furlough plays out will have consequences far beyond last Friday and, perhaps, far beyond June 2010 when they're scheduled to end. Some questions that we scribbled down after a recent lunch with Jason Dickerson, the guy at the Legislative Analyst's Office who looks at state worker issues:

  • Will the furloughs push some longtime state employees to retire a few years earlier than they might have? If furloughs do accelerate retirements of experienced, knowledgeable workers, what impact will that have on state services? How would a wave of earlier retirements impact CalPERS?
  • How will the Legislature react to this expanded gubernatorial leverage? Is a bill in the offing to limit the executive's furlough power? Would the next governor sign such a bill? If the bill is vetoed, would the Legislature be able to muster a two-thirds override vote?
  • Will furloughs become a gubernatorial campaign issue next year as candidates vie for union PAC contributions?
  • As colleague Hudson Sangree noted in his recent story about Yolo County furloughs, some workers there learned to adapt. When the state's furlough program ends, will state employees be upset that they have to go back to full work weeks?
  • If constitutional officers win the pending court fight over whether they have to furlough their employees, would that prompt migration by some state workers who want to avoid the furlough? (We've received a couple of e-mails from state workers who said they're considering it.)

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives