The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

February 27, 2009
No final decision in Chiang pay order case

A Sacramento Superior Court judge this afternoon listened to arguments in a lawsuit over whether Controller John Chiang can refuse an order to adjust state worker pay, then ended the hearing without rendering a final ruling.

Judge Timothy M. Frawley will probably issue a decision in the next few days. This afternoon's session lasted about 45 minutes with attorneys representing Chiang and Dave Gilb, director of the Department of Personnel Administration, debating whether Chiang was legally obligated to follow an administration order last summer to temporarily cut about 200,000 state workers' hourly wages to the federal minimum $6.55.

Pay amounts to salaried workers such as managers and administrators also would have been reduced with all pay and back wages restored only after the money was approved in a new budget.

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger last summer ordered the temporary wage reductions as a way to save money after lawmakers failed to agree on a budget by June 30, the end of the state's fiscal year. Gilb's office then issued letters to Chiang detailing how to reduce the pay amounts. Chiang refused to comply.

The controller's lawyer, Steven Rosenthal, told Frawley this afternoon that the pay letter instructions went beyond DPA's authority, that the order violated federal labor law and that the contoller literally couldn't comply because the state's aging systems made adjusting pay amounts "infeasible."

"The resources and systems are not in ... the controller's possession," Rosenthal said.

Attorney Christopher Thomas, representing Gilb, argued that DPA has "broad authority" in personnel matters that includes the temporary pay reductions, that the order didn't violate federal law and that Chiang hadn't offered a legal reason that "infeasibility" was a legal defense to refuse the order.

Frawley on Thursday issued a tentative ruling that the state controller doesn't have the authority to disregard a DPA pay letter and must "leave review of the decision (to alter pay) to the courts and/or the Legislature." The judge will probably hand down his final decision in a few days after considering this afternoon's arguments, but it's rare for a judge to change a tentative ruling.

Even if Frawley holds to his initial decision, it's unlikely to impact state worker pay any time soon. Lawmakers passed a budget that runs through June 2010, so money is appropriated to pay wages. A governor would need to issue another order to trigger the reduction.

And it's possible that the Chiang camp, which includes support from several state worker unions, would appeal a loss, although none so far has been willing to talk about that possibility.

A spokesman for Chiang's office declined to comment on the hearing.

You can read Frawley's tentative ruling here.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives