So we're working like heck on the story spinning from news today that Judge Patrick Marlettte essentially said, "No comment," when asked by the controller to explain whether the judge's court order last week meant constitutional offices fall under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's furlough authority.
Many state workers have correctly pointed out that employees whose pay comes from outside the general fund are still being furloughed. Meanwhile UC and CSU employees aren't subject to furlough, and now it looks like about 10,000 employees under seven officials elected by statewide vote are going to work all their hours and receive full pay. We're trying to reach the Board of Equalization to see what position its board is taking.
Is it OK to furlough some employees and not others? Do you think that some workers will try to migrate over to jobs in constitutional offices to avoid the furlough? (The LAO recently suggested this sort of thing might happen if furloughs aren't evenly spread.)
Is this setting up an unfair furlough system? Or is the principle of constitutional officer independence important enough to exempt employees in those departments and agencies?
The Author
About Comments
Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.