The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

March 20, 2009
CASE / SCIF furlough lawsuit continued to next month

SCIF logo blk.JPGA San Francisco Superior Court judge wants more debate on whether he should hear a furlough lawsuit filed by California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment and three SCIF employees.

Judge Peter Busch heard oral arguments this morning about whether the CASE/SCIF lawsuit, which names Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as a defendant, is sufficiently different from furlough cases heard in Sacramento Superior Court. The procedural point is important because if the judge thinks the lawsuit isn't substantially different than those litigated in Sacramento, he won't consider it out of deference to the Sacramento court's jurisdiction.

Here's what happened in court today, according to Department of Personnel Administration spokeswoman Lynelle Jolley:

After hearing oral argument on the procedural matter, the judge ordered the parties to brief the issue of whether the case should be heard in SF or transferred to Sacramento where the other actions have been filed. The State's brief is due March 30; CASE's reply brief is due April 9. At the next hearing, set for April 15, the judge will decide if he should keep the case in SF; if so, he will also rule on the merits at the same time.

The lawsuit by CASE and SCIF employees Glen Grossman, Mark Henderson and Geoffrey Sims names Schwarzenegger, DPA Director Dave Gilb, Controller John Chiang and SCIF President Jan Frank. It claims that Schwarzenegger's furlough order shouldn't include SCIF employees because the quasi-govermental workers' compensation fund doesn't get money from the state's general fund and is run independently.

Click here to see court filings by various parties in the case. We'll post more as they become available.

LOGO: www.scif.com

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives