The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

March 9, 2009
Union president urges agreement ratification

SEIU Local 1000 President Yvonne Walker has sent this letter to union members, urging that they vote for the tentative agreement the local reached last month with the state.

The letter, sent to The State Worker by a SEIU member, argues that a "no" vote will put the union at the mercy of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who might then impose terms such as,

... $6.55 (per hour), layoffs, two furlough days per month, increased out-of-pocket costs for health care premiums, and permanent loss of holidays.

(Our understanding is that Schwarzenegger can't impose the federal minimum wage unless the state is without allocated money for payroll, such as when lawmakers fail to put a budget in place by the start of a fiscal year. Read pages 4 and 5 of White v. Davis for the legal reasoning. The governor would also have to win his lawsuit to force Controller John Chiang to cut payroll checks at the reduced rate. Sacramento Superior Court Judge Timothy Frawley has issued a tentative ruling in that case and should issue a final ruling any time.)

SEIU's tentative deal has implications for state workers beyond the 95,000 represented by Local 1000. Every other union at the bargaining table is probably asking themselves: Is the SEIU TA the floor or the ceiling? Can we do better, or should we consider the Local 1000 deal something to which we aspire?

And what if the rank-and-file rejects the deal? The union would have to go back to the bargaining table. Then what? Would the administration budge? Or would it take the hard line that Walker suggests? And how would other unions view an SEIU rank-and-file rejection? Would members in other bargaining units vote the same way on a similar deal?

On a related note, click here for our recent post on the LAO analysis of the Local 1000 deal.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives