The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

March 17, 2009
No SEIU deal offered for scientists, union reports

We asked last week whether the tentative agreement SEIU Local 1000 reached with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration is the ceiling or the floor for the other unions now hammering out their own deals. Can the other bargaining units do better? Or is the SEIU contract as good as it gets?

The California Association of Professional Scientists says that its negotiators didn't get a Local 1000-type offer when they met with DPA last week, according a members-only e-mail. A CAPS member forwarded the e-mail to The State Worker; we confirmed its authenticity with a union official.

Your CAPS Bargaining Team met Wednesday with negotiators from the Governor's Department of Personnel Administration and several state departments which employ scientists. This lengthy meeting was most notable for what didn't happen, rather than what did. What didn't happen was that DPA didn't offer CAPS a comprehensive proposal similar to the one recently agreed to by SEIU. What did happen was that DPA verbally told CAPS that it wouldn't be offered the same elements of the SEIU agreement.

Rather, any such agreement with CAPS would not include layoff protections, the two floating holidays to replace Columbus Day and Lincoln's Birthday, or any language that would guarantee a reopening of negotiations in the event that DPA reached a better agreement with another union. In other words, Governor Schwarzenegger's DPA failed to present CAPS with any written proposal regarding a furlough program, and said that when it does, that proposal will not include several key elements from the SEIU agreement. CAPS has insisted that DPA present firm written proposals no later than the next scheduled meeting, April 2.

CAPS Proposals. CAPS presented proposals of its own. First, CAPS proposed a new "golden handshake" early retirement incentive proposal which would grant any state scientist who is eligible to retire two years of service and two years of age credit to encourage retirement on or before September 30, 2009. Second, CAPS proposed expansion of the voluntary personal leave program to enable scientists to increase participation in the voluntary personal leave program. Both proposals can be viewed on the CAPS webpage here:

The CAPS proposals are another effort by CAPS to suggest ways other than mandatory unpaid furloughs to save state money. The state's negotiators took the CAPS proposals under submission.

Regarding surplus notices, the official position of DPA is that no surplus notices are being withdrawn. CAPS has learned, however, that some state departments refused to issue surplus notices in the first place, and other departments have either withdrawn the notices or told employees that layoffs in their department will be unnecessary.

With nearly 80 percent of Unit 10 Scientists being funded by special and not general funds, it is no surprise that layoffs are very unlikely in Unit 10.

The CAPS Team next meets with DPA on April 2. Thanks for your continued support.

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives