The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

May 20, 2009
Another way to layoff, furlough state workers?

Among the hundreds of e-mails we've received in the last few days comes this one from a Corrections and Rehabilitation employee. With his permission on condition of withholding his last name, we offer his unedited e-mail here for your consideration and comment:

From: Michael

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009
To: Ortiz, Jon - Sacramento
Subject: State Lay-Offs

I agree that the state needs to do some cut backs and lay offs may be imminent, but the way they are currently doing the lay-offs is unfair. Just because someone has seniority doesn't mean that they have a better work ethic or more productivity of their work. Having just under 2 years with the state myself, I am constantly worried about my job. Its not fair, to know that I am working twice as hard as another "civil servant" who has been working for years. That person is merely here because it is to hard to fire them.

The state needs to work out something with the union to fire the "stereotypical" state worker. They are out there, but you're not going to find them merely through laying off the least senior workers.

Why not give managers more of a right to do their job and cut the fat. If a worker is doing a sub par job, let the manager give them write-ups and if you get a certain amount of write-ups in a certain date range, then well you're fired. I mean if you do that a couple of things will happen. One, its easier to fire crappy workers and that will save the state money and two, people will be scared of losing their jobs so their productivity will go up.

It's in no way a short term solution, but it will weed out those "lazy, stereotypical state workers."

Also, in regards to furloughs, why do a blanket furlough for everyone in the state? Here is an idea, for workers making 50,000+, furlough 1 day, workers making 100,000+ furlough them 2 days, and for those making 200,000+ furlough them 3 days.

When people make more money and a small portion is taken out, they can still put money into the economy, however when you take roughly 10% out of those who don't make a lot, it just takes money away from being spent in the economy and puts those in hard times.

What's going on now doesn't make sense, and there are obviously more rational solutions that what are being done and those which are proposed. I am just curious, what do you think? Do you think I am way of base?

Thanks for your time.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus


About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at jortiz@sacbee.com.

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog

Categories


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives