The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

September 4, 2009
Q&A reveals Local 1000's lawsuit paradox

Many state workers have been celebrating SEIU Local 1000's successful lawsuit to overturn Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's furlough of State Compensation Insurance Fund employees. But the win apparently has created some concern for the union's leaders. Why? Because the the lawsuit applies to a small, select group out of the 95,000 workers covered by SEIU.

The State Fund furlough lawsuit and Local 1000's shifting moves reveal the conundrum that the state's biggest public employee union often faces: Even when it wins, it loses with some of the rank-and-file.

Take the union's shifting positions with suing Schwarzenegger and State Fund. Regular readers of The State Worker will recall that at first SEIU wanted no part of a lawsuit that challenged State Fund furloughs. But after California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges, and Hearing Officers in State Employment won, we noticed many SEIU members, particularly the thousands who work for the fund, were incensed that their union hadn't been part of the action.

It wasn't long before Local 1000 decided it would file a similar lawsuit on behalf of the State Fund employees it represents.

Now the union has won, it's clear that it wants to quell resentment from union members who don't work for State Fund and are still under the governor's three-day furlough order. It's put out "How the SCIF furlough exemption impacts other Local 1000 Members," a Q&A that explains the win as a significant crack in the legal dam that so far has kept furloughs in place for nearly everyone else under the governor's control.

This blog hasn't noticed anything close to the level of anger that surfaced when the union failed to join the State Fund furlough battle early on. From our point of view, it looks like SEIU's win hasn't stirred up much trouble among the rank-and-file.

Click here to read the union's Q&A.

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives