The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

October 8, 2009
Feds want proof that furloughs aren't affecting EDD

heading_edd.jpgThe U.S. Department of Labor is threatening to cut off federal grant money from California's Employment Development Department unless the state can show furloughs aren't affecting unemployment insurance administration.

Here's the intro from the Monday letter (stamped, "RECEIVED OCT 7 2009") that Richard C.Trigg, regional administrator of the Labor Department's Employment and Training Administration in San Francisco, wrote to EDD Director Patrick Henning:

In light of the fact that the unemployment insurance program (UI) has not been exempted from the state-wide furlough of employees imposed by the Governor, we are writing to advise you that UI Program Letter (UIPL) number 09-98 requires you to demonstrate that no decline in the performance of the UI program will occur as the result of this state-wide action.

The letter cites Social Security Act law as the basis for the Labor Department's concern:

This requirement is intended to ensure proper and prompt delivery of UI services to claimants and employers. Any state action that does not take into account the UI service delivery needs of workers and employers in not a "method of administration" consistent with Section 303(a)(1), SSA. Federal grants to the State could be jeopardized by failure to meet this "methods of administration" requirement of Section 303(a)(l), SSA.

Click here to read Section 303(a)(l).

Then Trigg throws in a bit of recent history:

We note that California is already experiencing difficulty in several critical performance areas including first pay timeliness, non-monetary determination timeliness, appeals timeliness and appeals case aging. Despite Corrective Action Plans for timeliness of first pays, non-monetary determination and appeals, performance has continued to decline over the past year. Your response must specifically address these issues and should cover the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board.

We called EDD and then e-mailed several questions about the federal notice. We'll post the department's response when we get it.

Read Trigg's letter by clicking this link.

Thanks to blog user J for sending it our way.


About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives