The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

November 6, 2009
More about the 'New Public Employees Benefits Reform Act'

As we reported last night, the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility on Thursday re-filed proposed ballot measures that would create a mandatory second-tier pension system for new public employees hired by the state, counties, cities and other non-federal government agencies in California.

The group put forward a similar measure in 2007, but it didn't have the financial support to gather enough signatures to qualify for a statewide vote. Foundation President Marcia Fritz figures it will take $2 million to gather the 1 million signatures needed to get the initiative before voters in the November 2010 election. She said no well-financed backer has stepped forward with a big check.

In a telephone interview this morning, Fritz outlined a strategy that includes an aggressive Web-based signature-gathering campaign and a push to get 2010 gubernatorial candidates such as Meg Whitman to take up the cause.

"We hope that the candidates will step up and help us raise money," Fritz said. "It would give us exposure and give them an issue to talk about."

Fritz, who runs an accounting firm in Citrus Heights, estimates the savings from the foundation's benefit rollback for new hires would save California $1 billion in pension costs one year after taking effect on June 30, 2011.

Some features of the plan:

  • Changes the retirement formula for new peace officers and firefighters from the current 3 percent times years of service at age 50 to 2.3 percent at age 58.
  • Cuts the formula for other newly-hired public safety employees, such as park rangers and game wardens, from the current 2.5 percent at age 55 to 1.8 percent at age 60.
  • Ties the full retirement age for all other employees to the federal standard. Those workers paying into Social Security would get a defined pension based on no more than 1.25 percent of pay. Those who don't contribute to Social Security would get no more than 1.65 percent.
  • Caps annual pension benefits at 75 percent of an employee's annual base wage.
  • Requires retirement benefits be based on a three-year average of base pay, excluding things like overtime, uniform pay, bonuses, longevity pay, accrued but unused vacation pay.
  • Requires that any public employee retirement enhancements go to a public vote. The foundation has filed two versions with the Attorney General, one requiring a simple majority vote of the people to enact enhancements and the other a two-thirds vote. Fritz said her group is seeking feedback before deciding which one to push for a public vote.
  • Click here to read one version and click here to read the other.

    About Comments

    Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

    What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

    Here are some rules of the road:

    • Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

    • Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

    • Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

    • Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

    • Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

    • Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

    • Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

    • Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

    You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

    If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

    hide comments
    blog comments powered by Disqus

    About The State Worker

    Jon Ortiz The Author

    Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


    Now on the State Worker column

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]

    State Pay Database

    This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

    Latest Capitol Alert headlines

      404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

      404 Not Found

      Our apologies....

      We can't find the page you requested in this location.

      The story may have moved or expired.

      You may wish to:

    • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


    May 2013

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  

    Monthly Archives