The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

May 27, 2010
Column Extra: More about Ronald George

Thumbnail image for 100527 Ronald George.jpgToday's State Worker column looks at whether Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and state Supreme Court Justice Ronald George conspired to trade a bump in the judicial funding in the May budget revision for a furlough litigation decision that favored the governor.

Our conclusion: Nope, despite our skepticism and journalistic love of a good, legitimate conspiracy.

So who is Ronald George? Read his profile on the court website by clicking here. The Metropolitan News-Enterprise ran this story not long after George took office in 1996.

The State Worker column today refers to George's annual address to the Legislature. This Supreme Court Web page contains links to his annual "State of the Judiciary" addresses dating back to 1999.

George also has been at the center of a furlough controversy. With the Judicial Council's Administrative Office of the Court putting millions of dollars into a controversial statewide computer system that could ultimately carry a $2 billion price tag, the council decided to close courts one day per month.

George says the computer system is vital to effectively running the far-flung state court system. He and many other judges also voluntarily cut their own pay by 4.65 percent, equal to the one-day furlough ordered throughout the judicial system.

But as Bee colleague Robert Lewis has reported, some judges have blasted the computer system upgrade as a boondoggle that is needlessly draining court resources.

And George is a key voice in how the judicial branch spends SB 1407 funds, which two years ago gave the courts $5 billion in bond money for courthouse construction to be paid through a mix of court fees, penalties, and assessments. Here's the court's SB 1407 Web page, which lays out the projects approved so far for funding.

PHOTO CREDIT: Chief Justice Ronald George speaks during a March 5, 2009 hearing on voter-approved Proposition 8, which banned gay marriages. / Paul Sakuma, Associated Press

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives